| Literature DB >> 28817658 |
Guangxin Li1,2, Chao Wang1, Meichen Feng1, Wude Yang1, Fangzhou Li2, Ruiyun Feng2.
Abstract
The growth status of winter wheat in irrigated field and rainfed field are obviously different and the field types may have an effect on the predictive accuracy of hyperspectral model. The objectives of the present study were to understand the difference of spectral sensitive wavelengths for leaf area index (LAI) in two field types and realize its hyperspectral prediction. In study, a total of 31 and 28 sample sites in irrigated fields and rainfed fields respectively were selected from Wenxi County, and the LAI and canopy spectra were also collected at the main grow stage of winter wheat. The method of successive projections algorithm (SPA) was applied by selecting the important wavelengths, and the multiple linear regression (MLR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) were used to construct the predictive model based on the important wavelengths and full wavelengths, respectively. Moreover, the parameters of variable importance project (VIP) and B-coefficient derived from PLSR analysis were implemented to validate the evaluated wavelengths using the SPA method. The sensitive wavelengths of LAI for irrigated field and rainfed field were 404, 407, 413, 417, 450, 677, 715, 735, 816, 1127 and 404, 406, 432, 501, 540, 679, 727, 779, 1120, 1290 nm, respectively, and these wavelengths proved to be highly correlated with LAI. Compared with the model performance based on the SPA-MLR and PLSR methods, the method of SPA-MLR was proved to be better (rainfed field: R2 = 0.736, RMSE = 1.169, RPD = 1.6245; irrigated field: R2 = 0.716, RMSE = 1.059, RPD = 1.538). Moreover, the predictive model of LAI in rainfed fields had a better accuracy than the model in irrigated fields. The results from this study indicated that it was necessary to classify the field type while monitoring the winter wheat using the remote sensing technology. This study also demonstrated that the multivariate method of SPA-MLR could accurately evaluate the sensitive wavelengths and construct the predictive model of LAI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28817658 PMCID: PMC5560714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive statistic analysis of leaf area index.
| Field style | Sample classifications | Sample | Range | Minimum | Maximum | Average | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irrigation fields | Calibrated set | 62 | 10.60 | 1.31 | 11.91 | 5.100 | 2.283 |
| Validation set | 31 | 7.31 | 1.53 | 8.84 | 5.248 | 2.094 | |
| Rainfed fields | Calibrated set | 56 | 8.95 | 0.31 | 9.27 | 2.951 | 2.002 |
| Validation set | 28 | 4.64 | 0.28 | 4.92 | 2.458 | 1.428 |
Fig 1Correlation coefficients between spectral wavebands and LAI of winter wheat in rainfed field and irrigated field.
Important wavelengths of LAI selected with the SPA method using the calibration set.
| Field style | Important wavelengths (nm) |
|---|---|
| Irrigation field | 404、407、413、417、450、677、715、735、816、1127 |
| Rainfed fields | 404、406、432、501、540、679、727、779、1120、1290 |
Fig 2Selection of the optimal factor number of LAI in PLSR analysis under the rainfed field and irrigated field.
Fig 3Variable characteristic of LAI for winter wheat derived from PLSR analysis in rainfed field and irrigated field.
Models performance of LAI based on the multivariate methods in rainfed field and irrigated field.
| Multivariate methods | Field styles | Calibration set | Validation set | Variable number | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | RMSE | RPD | R2 | RMSE | RPD | |||
| SPA-MLR | Irrigation field | 0.716 | 1.059 | 1.538 | 0.635 | 1.221 | 1.469 | 10 |
| Rainfed field | 0.736 | 1.169 | 1.624 | 0.661 | 1.206 | 1.473 | 10 | |
| PLSR | Irrigation field | 0.552 | 1.520 | 1.413 | 0.541 | 1.742 | 1.084 | 4 |
| Rained field | 0.579 | 1.288 | 1.456 | 0.684 | 1.122 | 1.400 | 4 | |
Fig 4Linear relationships (1:1) between the referenced values and predicted values of LAI in irrigated field and rained field of winter wheat (the solid line and the dotted line are the fitted line and referenced line, respectively).