Literature DB >> 28817242

Improved medical student perception of ultrasound using a paired anatomy teaching assistant and clinician teaching model.

Jacob P Smith1, John L Kendall2,3, Danielle F Royer4.   

Abstract

This study describes a new teaching model for ultrasound (US) training, and evaluates its effect on medical student attitudes toward US. First year medical students participated in hands-on US during human gross anatomy (2014 N = 183; 2015 N = 182). The sessions were facilitated by clinicians alone in 2014, and by anatomy teaching assistant (TA)-clinician pairs in 2015. Both cohorts completed course evaluations which included five US-related items on a four-point scale; cohort responses were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests with significance threshold set at 0.05. The 2015 survey also evaluated the TAs (three items, five-point scale). With the adoption of the TA-clinician teaching model, student ratings increased significantly for four out of five US-items: "US advanced my ability to learn anatomy" increased from 2.91 ± 0.77 to 3.35 ± 0.68 (P < 0.0001), "Incorporating US increased my interest in anatomy" from 3.05 ± 0.84 to 3.50 ± 0.71 (P < 0.0001), "US is relevant to my current educational needs" from 3.36 ± 0.63 to 3.54 ± 0.53 (P = 0.015), and "US training should start in Phase I" from 3.36 ± 0.71 to 3.56 ± 0.59 (P = 0.010). Moreover, more than 84% of students reported that TAs enhanced their understanding of anatomy (mean 4.18 ± 0.86), were a valuable part of US training (mean 4.23 ± 0.89), and deemed the TAs proficient in US (mean 4.24 ± 0.86). By using an anatomy TA-clinician teaching team, this study demonstrated significant improvements in student perceptions of the impact of US on anatomy education and the relevancy of US training to the early stages of medical education. Anat Sci Educ 11: 175-184.
© 2017 American Association of Anatomists. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy teaching; gross anatomy education; medical education; teaching assistant; ultrasound education; undergraduate education

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28817242     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  4 in total

1.  Confidence Level and Ability of Medical Students to Identify Abdominal Structures After Integrated Ultrasound Sessions.

Authors:  Fauzia Nausheen; Corey Young; John Brazil; Timothy Dunagan; Renu Bhupathy; Sambandam Elango; Jason Crowley
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2020-07-22

Review 2.  Ultrasonography in undergraduate medical education: a comprehensive review and the education program implemented at Jichi Medical University.

Authors:  Toru Kameda; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Kei Konno; Harumi Koibuchi; Kiyoka Omoto; Kouichi Itoh
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Introduction of ultrasound-based living anatomy into the medical curriculum: a survey on medical students' perceptions.

Authors:  Pelagia Kefala-Karli; Leandros Sassis; Marina Sassi; Constantinos Zervides
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2021-12-04

4.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.