Literature DB >> 28817163

Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.

Benjamin F Ricciardi, Brad S Waddell, Scott R Nodzo, Jeffrey Lange, Allina A Nocon, Spencer Amundsen, T David Tarity, Alexander S McLawhorn.   

Abstract

Recently, providers have begun to publicly report the results of patient satisfaction surveys from their practices. However, these outcomes have never been compared with the findings of commercial online physician rating websites. The goals of the current study were to (1) compare overall patient satisfaction ratings for orthopedic surgeons derived from provider-based third-party surveys with existing commercial physician rating websites and (2) determine the association between patient ratings and provider characteristics. The authors identified 12 institutions that provided publicly available patient satisfaction outcomes derived from third-party surveys for their orthopedic surgeons as of August 2016. Orthopedic surgeons at these institutions were eligible for inclusion (N=340 surgeons). Provider characteristics were recorded from publicly available data. Four high-traffic commercial online physician rating websites were identified: Healthgrades.com, UCompareHealthCare.com, Vitals.com, and RateMDs.com. For each surgeon, overall ratings (on a scale of 1-5), total number of ratings, and percentage of negative ratings were compared between provider-initiated internal ratings and each commercial online website. Associations between baseline factors and overall physician ratings and negative ratings were assessed. Provider-initiated internal patient satisfaction ratings showed a greater number of overall patient ratings, higher overall patient satisfaction ratings, and a lower percentage of negative comments compared with commercial online physician rating websites. A greater number of years in practice had a weak association with lower internal ratings, and an academic practice setting and a location in the Northeast were protective factors for negative physician ratings. Compared with commercial online physician rating websites, provider-initiated patient satisfaction ratings of orthopedic surgeons appear to be more favorable, with greater numbers of responses. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):304-310.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28817163     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170810-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  3 in total

1.  Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Daniel A Harris; Anne Murray; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Natalie R Uhr; Sherry Y M Shin; Kristal C Xie; Chong Y Kim; Tadashi T Funahashi; Michael H Kanter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Caroline M Norton; Lindsey M Russo; Aruna Priya; Sarah L Goff; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.