| Literature DB >> 28817153 |
Philippe Jean-Luc Gradidge1, Demitri Constantinou2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this comparative study was to determine the gender differences in cardiac morphology and performance in adolescent black South African footballers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28817153 PMCID: PMC6002788 DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2017-032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr ISSN: 1015-9657 Impact factor: 1.167
Characteristics of adolescent South African footballers by gender
| Proportion (%) | 100 | 50.9 | 49.1 | 1.8 |
| Age (years) | 14.8 ± 1.3 | 15.5 ± 1.1 | 14.1 ± 1.1* | 9.5 |
| Height (m) | 1.61 ± 0.1 | 1.66 ± 0.1 | 1.56 ± 0.1* | 6.2 |
| Weight (kg) | 54 ± 8.5 | 58.3 ± 7.2 | 49.5 ± 7.3* | 16.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) by age range | ||||
| 12–13 years (n) | 19.9 ± 2.3 (26) | 20.1 ± 1 (4) | 19.8 ± 2.5 (22) | 1.5 |
| 14–15 years (n) | 20.7 ± 2.1 (92) | 20.9 ± 1.4 (35) | 20.5 ± 2.5 (57) | 1.9 |
| 16–17 years (n) | 21.1 ± 2.2 (49) | 21.1 ± 1.9 (46) | 20.7 ± 0.2 (3) | 1.9 |
| Body fat (kg) | 14.4 ± 4.5 | 12.1 ± 3.6 | 16.8 ± 4.1* | 32.5 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 51.1 ± 4.9 | 53.5 ± 3.9 | 48.7 ± 4.7* | 9.4 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 64 ± 7.2 | 64.8 ± 7 | 63.1 ± 7.3 | 2.7 |
| IVS thickness (mm) | 9.2 ± 1.7 | 9.9 ± 1.5 | 8.4 ± 1.6* | 16.4 |
| LVED | 44.8 ± 7.5 | 48.7 ± 3.8 | 40.7 ± 8.1* | 17.9 |
| Resting heart rate (bpm) | 68.9 ± 9.8 | 65.8 ± 10.6 | 72.2 ± 7.6* | 9.3 |
| Peak heart rate (bpm) | 174.8 ± 9 | 176.7 ± 8.1 | 172.8 ± 4.8* | 2.2 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 113.8 ± 10 | 117.2 ± 10.9 | 110.3 ± 7.5* | 6.1 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 71.2 ± 8.2 | 72.3 ± 8.1 | 69.3 ± 8* | 4.2 |
| VJH (cm) | 37.2 ± 10.3 | 43.1 ± 8.9 | 31.2 ± 8* | 32 |
| Trunk flexibility (cm) | 40.3 ± 4.9 | 40.3 ± 3.7 | 40.4 ± 5.9 | 0.3 |
Data presented as mean ± SD; *p < 0.05 versus males; †Percentage difference (male minus female/male).
BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; IVS: interventricular septal thickness;
VJH: vertical jump height; LVED: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter.
Pearson’s correlations for VJH, ejection fraction, IVS thickness and LVED presented by gender
| Age | 0.4* | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.01 | –0.2 | –0.1 | –0.2 | –0.1 |
| BMI | 0.2 | –0.1 | –0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | –0.1 | 0.2* | –0.1 |
| Body fat | –0.3* | –0.4* | –0.5* | 0.1 | 0.4* | –0.2 | –0.1 | –0.2 |
| Lean mass | 0.7* | 0.7* | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | –0.3* | 0.1 | –0.3* |
| Ejection fraction | 0.2 | –0.1 | –0.4 | 0.5* | –0.02 | 0.5* | ||
| IVS thickness | –0.1 | –0.2 | –0.4* | 0.5* | 0.1 | 0.9* | ||
| LVED | 0.1 | –0.2 | –0.02 | 0.5* | 0.1 | 0.9* | ||
| Resting heart rate | –0.2 | –0.3* | 0.3* | 0.1 | –0.4* | –0.3* | –0.1 | –0.3* |
| Systolic BP | –0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | –0.004 | 0.1 | –0.02 | 0.03 | –0.04 |
| Diastolic BP | –0.3* | 0.2 | –0.1 | –0.1 | 0.04 | –0.5* | –0.1 | –0.6* |
| VJH | 0.2 | –0.1 | –0.1 | –0.2 | 0.1 | –0.2 | ||
| Trunk Flexibility | –0.3* | 0.02 | 0.1 | –0.04 | –0.2* | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Data presented as r coefficient for males (n = 85) and females (n = 82); *p < 0.05. BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; LVED: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; IVS: interventricular septal thickness; VJH: vertical jump height.
Multivariable linear regression models for determining the influence of body composition, blood pressure, cardiac morphology and performance on VJH, LVED, IVS thickness and ejection fraction
| Body fat | –0.2* | –0.1 | 0.2* | 0.2* |
| Ejection fraction | 0.04 | –0.02 | 0.2* | |
| Lean mass | 0.5* | 0.04 | –0.1 | –0.1 |
| IVS thickness | 0.004 | –0.04 | 0.6* | |
| LVED | –0.03 | 0.5* | 0.7* | |
| RHR | –0.1 | 0.3* | –0.2* | –0.001 |
| Systolic BP | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.1 |
| Diastolic BP | -0.02 | -0.04 | 0.02 | –0.2* |
| VJH | 0.1 | 0.01 | –0.03 | |
| R2 | 0.66* | 0.19* | 0.59* | 0.67* |
Data presented as adjusted β; *p < 0.05. All models were adjusted for age and gender. LVED: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; IVS: interventricular septal thickness; VJH: vertical jump height; RHR: resting heart rate.