| Literature DB >> 28817053 |
Giulia Fornasieri1, Merwen Aouadi2, Emilie Delahaye3, Patricia Beaunier4, Dominique Durand5, Eric Rivière6, Pierre-Antoine Albouy7, François Brisset8, Anne Bleuzen9.
Abstract
The research of new molecular materials able to replace classical solid materials in electronics has attracted growing attention over the past decade. Among theseEntities:
Keywords: Prussian blue analogue; confined precipitation; mesoporous silica; photomagnetism; sol-gel
Year: 2012 PMID: 28817053 PMCID: PMC5448922 DOI: 10.3390/ma5030385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Illustration of the step-by-step approach for Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) processing.
Figure 2(a) Photos of the Co(II)-containing silica sols in an acidic (left) and basic (right) medium (sols and gels have the same appearance); (b) UV-Visible spectra of the Co(II)-containing silica gels obtained after addition of NaOH aqueous solutions with different concentrations 0 M (dark green), 0.1 M (blue), 0.2 M (violet), 0.3 M (purple), 0.4 M (green), 0.5 M (red), 1 M (black)).
Figure 3(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the RbCoFe PBA/silica xerogel nanocomposite (microtomed sample); (b) High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of one RbCoFe PBA/nanoparticle (microtomed sample). The white square surrounds one PBA aggregate and the circles inside on figure b indicate the cristallographic domains; (c) XRD pattern of the RbCoFe PBA/silica xerogel nanocomposite (Cu Kα1 = 0.1540598 nm).
Figure 4Magnetization curves for (a) the RbCoFe PBA/silica nanocomposite and (b) the bulk RbCoFe PBA before (●) and after (○) irradiation.
Figure 5Photographs of (a) the Co(II)-containing silica copolymer monolith, (b) the Co(II)-containing silica mesoporous monolith obtained after thermal treatment, and (c) the ordered CoFe PBA/silica nanocomposite after impregnation with an acidic solution of K3[Fe(CN)6].
Figure 6On the left UV-visible spectra of the Co(II)-containing silica monoliths (a) before and (b) after thermal treatment at 500 °C. On the right, small angle XRD patterns of the Co(II)-containing silica monoliths (c) before and (d) after thermal treatment at 500 °C.
Figure 7N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the monoliths containing 2% wt of Co(II) ions after thermal treatment at 500 °C (black curve) and after impregnation in an acidic solution of K3[Fe(CN)6] (violet curve).
Figure 8(a) TEM micrograph of the RbCoFe PBA/silica monolith nanocomposite (transverse section of microtomed sample); (b) HRTEM micrograph of the same nanocomposite. White circles surround the RbCoFe PBA single crystalline nanoparticles; (c) XRD pattern of the RbCoFe PBA/silica monolith nanocomposite (Cu Kα1 = 0.1540598 nm).
Figure 9Temperature dependence of the magnetization before (●) and after (○) irradiation (T = 10 K λ = 642 nm, P = 15 mW·cm−2) of RbCoFe PBA/silica nanocomposite.
Figure 10UV-visible spectra of the Co(II)-containing silica films: (a) as-synthesized; (b) after thermal treatment at 500 °C; (c) after impregnation with the ferricyanide acidic solution.
Figure 11Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the calcined Co(II)-containing silica films: (a) Top-view; (b) Side-view.
Figure 122D XRD diffraction patterns obtained at grazing incidence of the Co(II)-containing silica film: (a) as synthesized; (b) after thermal treatment at 500 °C.
Figure 13(a) TEM image of the thermally treated Co(II)-containing silica film. (microtomed sample); (b) TEM image of RbCoFe PBA/silica film nanocomposite (microtomed sample). Scale bar is 200 nm.