| Literature DB >> 28817043 |
Rui F M Lobo1,2, Diogo M F Santos3,4, Cesar A C Sequeira5,6, Jorge H F Ribeiro7,8.
Abstract
Different types of experimental studies are performed using the hydrogen storage alloy (HSA) MlNi3.6Co0.85Al0.3Mn0.3 (Ml: La-rich mischmetal), chemically surface treated, as the anode active material for application in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The recently developed molecular beam-thermal desorption spectrometry (MB-TDS) technique is here reported for detecting the electrochemical hydrogen uptake and release by the treated HSA. The MB-TDS allows an accurate determination of the hydrogen mass absorbed into the hydrogen storage alloy (HSA), and has significant advantages in comparison with the conventional TDS method. Experimental data has revealed that the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) using such chemically treated alloy presents an enhanced surface capability for hydrogen adsorption.Entities:
Keywords: fuel cell anode; hydride electrode; hydrogen storage; thermal desorption spectrometry
Year: 2012 PMID: 28817043 PMCID: PMC5448915 DOI: 10.3390/ma5020248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Molecular beam—thermal desorption mass spectrometer (MB-TDS) (Adapted from [6]).
Figure 2Particle size distribution of the mechanically pulverized HSA and of the HSAs ball-milled in different media.
Mean particle size and specific surface area of the mechanically pulverized hydrogen storage alloy (HSA) and of the HSAs ball-milled in different media.
| Preparation method | Mean particle size (μm) | Specific surface area (m2·g−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Ball-milled under 3 atm H2 | 11.969 | 1.2069 |
| Ball-milled under 3 atm Ar | 12.272 | 1.1702 |
| Ball-milled in ethanol | 16.561 | 0.8096 |
| Mechanical pulverisation | 43.410 | 0.3272 |
Figure 3Working stabilities of the HSA anode membrane electrode assembly (MEA) in comparison with Pt/C MEA at a constant current load of 40 mA/cm2 (operating conditions: electrode area 1 cm2, pressure PH = PO = 2 atm; working temperature Tcell = 25 °C, wetting temperature Tanode = Tcathode = 40 °C).
Figure 4U-i and P-i characteristics for the HSA anode MEA and for the Pt/C anode MEA. Operating conditions: A = 1 cm2, = = 2 atm, Tcell = Tanode = Tcathode = 60 °C. Open symbols refer to the RH scale.
Figure 5MB-TDS spectrum of two (previously electrochemical) charged hydrogenated MlNi3.6Co0.85Al0.3Mn0.3 alloys submitted to a heating rate of 1 °C/min. The HSA (I) has a larger absorbed hydrogen mass than HSA (II). Adapted from [6].
Figure 6p-c-T isotherms for HSA.
Figure 7Cell performance of HSA-MEA anode at different temperatures.
Electrode parameters of MEA anode at different temperatures (assuming the anode as MEA reaction rate control electrode).
| Tcell (°C) | U0 (V) | bTafel (V/dec) | Ri(Ω/cm2) | i0 (A/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 0.7828 | 0.02343 | 2.53 | 1.95 × 10−4 |
| 60 | 0.8071 | 0.02093 | 2.09 | 6.42 × 10−4 |
| 90 | 0.7592 | 0.03395 | 7.27 | 5.48 × 10−4 |
| 120 | ____ | - | 41.5 | - |