Literature DB >> 28816510

Treatment Recommendations as Actions.

Tanya Stivers1, John Heritage1, Rebecca K Barnes2, Rose McCabe3, Laura Thompson4, Merran Toerien5.   

Abstract

From the earliest studies of doctor-patient interaction (Byrne & Long, 1976), it has been recognized that treatment recommendations may be expressed in more or less authoritative ways, based on their design and delivery. There are clear differences between I'm going to start you on X and We can give you X to try and Would you like me to give you X? Yet little is known about this variation, its contexts, or its consequences. In this paper, we develop a basic taxonomy of treatment recommendations in primary care as a first step toward a more comprehensive investigation. We take as our point of departure the observation that treatment recommendations such as those above represent not only different formulations but also different social actions. We distinguish five main treatment recommendation actions: pronouncements, suggestions, proposals, offers, and assertions. We ask: what are the main dimensions on which these recommendations vary and to what end? And what sorts of factors shape a clinician's use of one action type over another with respect to recommending a medication in the primary care context?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28816510     DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  9 in total

1.  Patient-Initiated Pain Expressions: Interactional Asymmetries and Consequences for Cancer Care.

Authors:  Chelsea R Chapman; Wayne A Beach
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Treatment Recommendations in Oncology Visits: Implications for Patient Agency and Physician Authority.

Authors:  Alexandra Tate
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-09-05

3.  How Psychiatrists Recommend Treatment and Its Relationship with Patient Uptake.

Authors:  Laura Thompson; Rose McCabe
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-08-16

4.  Variation and Interactional Non-Standardization in Neuropsychological Tests: The Case of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination.

Authors:  Danielle Jones; Ray Wilkinson; Clare Jackson; Paul Drew
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2019-09-25

5.  Technology-Enhanced Consultations in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure: Protocol for the Qualitative Analysis of Remote Consultations (QuARC) Project.

Authors:  Sara E Shaw; Deborah Cameron; Joseph Wherton; Lucas M Seuren; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Satyajit Bhattacharya; Christine A'Court; Joanne Morris; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  Use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Practice: Interactions between patients and physicians.

Authors:  Joseph Ford; Felicity Thomas; Richard Byng; Rose McCabe
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-06-20

7.  Subsequent Actions Engendered by the Absence of an Immediate Response to the Proposal in Mandarin Mundane Talk.

Authors:  Quanxi Hao; Hui Guo; Chuntao Li; Shuai Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Bedside matters: Acknowledging responsibility in effective doctor-patient conversations.

Authors:  Sarah J White
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Exploring how patients respond to GP recommendations for mental health treatment: an analysis of communication in primary care consultations.

Authors:  Joseph Ford; Felicity Thomas; Richard Byng; Rose McCabe
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2019-10-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.