Literature DB >> 28816265

China's embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions.

David Cyranoski.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28816265     DOI： 10.1038/548272a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility.

Authors:  Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Query the merits of embryo editing for reproductive research now.

Authors:  Insoo Hyun; Catherine Osborn
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Better beings?

Authors:  Amber Dance
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.

Authors:  Derek So
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alix Lenia V Hammerstein; Matthias Eggel; Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.652
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.