Literature DB >> 28816075

Psychological impact of female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study.

Magdy R Ahmed1, Mohamed M Shaaban1, Heba K Meky2, Mohamed E Amin Arafa3, Tamer Y Mohamed1, Waleed F Gharib1, Abeer B Ahmed1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, at least 200 million women and girls have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM). The medical and sexual consequences have been documented, but the psychological impact has not been studied to the same extent. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between FGM and psychiatric problems among adolescent girls.
METHODS: A total of 204 girls, aged 14-19 years, were included in a cross-sectional study conducted at Suez Canal University Hospitals. All participants completed an Arabic-validated, structured questionnaire covering nine symptom scales. Sociodemographic data were also collected. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of psychiatric problems among adolescent girls who had undergone FGM.
RESULTS: Overall, 66.2% of girls had undergone FGM. The percentage in rural areas was 91.8%, compared with 43.0% in urban areas. There were no significant differences between the FGM and non-FGM groups as regards religion, educational and socioeconomic levels. FGM girls had a significantly higher level of psychological problems with regard to somatisation, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety and hostility compared with non-FGM girls (p < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: FGM is a traumatic experience that may leave a lasting psychological mark and a negative impact on the psychological status of affected girls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent girls; female genital mutilation; psychological symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28816075     DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1355454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  11 in total

Review 1.  Factors associated with female genital mutilation: a systematic review and synthesis of national, regional and community-based studies.

Authors:  Zeinab El-Dirani; Leen Farouki; Christelle Akl; Ubah Ali; Chaza Akik; Stephen J McCall
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Mapping the lack of public initiative against female genital mutilation in Denmark.

Authors:  Gro Møller Christoffersen; Peter James Bruhn; Rosanna de Neergaard; Susanne Engel; Vibeke Naeser
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Salma M Abdalla; Sandro Galea
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-07-15

4.  Prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practices of female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) among United Arab Emirates population.

Authors:  Shamsa Al Awar; Moamar Al-Jefout; Nawal Osman; Zuhur Balayah; Nourah Al Kindi; Teodora Ucenic
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Cyrus Alinia; Bakhtiar Piroozi; Fariba Jahanbin; Hossein Safari; Amjad Mohamadi-Bolbanabad; Ali Kazemi-Karyani; Ghobad Moradi; Fariba Farhadifar; Mohammad Ebrahimi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Samuel Kimani; Caroline W Kabiru; Jacinta Muteshi; Jaldesa Guyo
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2020-01-28

7.  The association between physical complications following female genital cutting and the mental health of 12-year-old Gambian girls: A community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bothild Bendiksen; Trond Heir; Fabakary Minteh; Mai Mahgoub Ziyada; Rex A Kuye; Inger-Lise Lien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Facilitating Factors of Professional Health Practice Regarding Female Genital Mutilation: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  M Idoia Ugarte-Gurrutxaga; Brígida Molina-Gallego; Laura Mordillo-Mateos; Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino; M Carmen Solano-Ruiz; Gonzalo Melgar de Corral
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.

Authors:  David Tordrup; Chrissy Bishop; Nathan Green; Max Petzold; Fernando Ruiz Vallejo; Joshua P Vogel; Christina Pallitto
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-02

10.  "I Can't Blame Mum": A Qualitative Exploration of Relational Dynamics in Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Rebecca J Newton; Jennifer Glover
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2021-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.