Qing Zhou1, Ting Yu1, Yuan Liu1, Ruifen Shi2, Suping Tian3, Chaoxia Yang4, Huaxiu Gan5, Yanying Zhu6, Xia Liang7, Ling Wang8, Zhenhua Wu9, Jinping Huang10, Ailing Hu1. 1. The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Guangdong Nursing Association, Guangzhou, China. 3. Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. 4. The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China. 5. Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 6. The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. 7. The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China. 8. Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China. 9. Foshan First People 's Hospital, Foshan, China. 10. Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the pressure ulcer prevalence in secondary and tertiary general hospitals in different areas of Guangdong Province in China and explore the possible risk factors that are related to pressure ulcers. BACKGROUND: Few multicentre studies have been conducted on pressure ulcer prevalence in Chinese hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was used. METHODS: Data from a total of 25,264 patients were included in the analysis at 25 hospitals in China. The investigators were divided into two groups. The investigators in group 1 examined the patients' skin. When a pressure ulcer was found, a pressure ulcer assessment form was completed. The investigators in group 2 provided guidance to the nurses, who assessed all patients and completed another questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the relationship between the possible risk factors and pressure ulcer. RESULTS: The overall prevalence rate of pressure ulcers in the 25 hospitals ranged from 0%-3.49%, with a mean of 1.26%. The most common stage of the pressure ulcers was stage II (41.4%); most common anatomical locations were sacrum (39.5%) and the feet (16.4%). Braden score (p < .001), expected length of stay (p < .001), incontinence (p < .001), care group (p = .011), hospital location (p < .001), type of hospitals (p = .004), ages of patients (p < .001) were associations of pressure ulcers from the multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence rate of pressure ulcers in Chinese hospitals was lower than that reported in previous investigations. Specific characteristics of pressure ulcer patients were as follows: low Braden score, longer expected length of stay, double incontinence, an ICU and a medical ward, hospital location in the Pearl River Delta, a university hospital and an older patient. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The survey could make managers know their prevalence level of pressure ulcers and provide priorities for clinical nurses.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the pressure ulcer prevalence in secondary and tertiary general hospitals in different areas of Guangdong Province in China and explore the possible risk factors that are related to pressure ulcers. BACKGROUND: Few multicentre studies have been conducted on pressure ulcer prevalence in Chinese hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was used. METHODS: Data from a total of 25,264 patients were included in the analysis at 25 hospitals in China. The investigators were divided into two groups. The investigators in group 1 examined the patients' skin. When a pressure ulcer was found, a pressure ulcer assessment form was completed. The investigators in group 2 provided guidance to the nurses, who assessed all patients and completed another questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the relationship between the possible risk factors and pressure ulcer. RESULTS: The overall prevalence rate of pressure ulcers in the 25 hospitals ranged from 0%-3.49%, with a mean of 1.26%. The most common stage of the pressure ulcers was stage II (41.4%); most common anatomical locations were sacrum (39.5%) and the feet (16.4%). Braden score (p < .001), expected length of stay (p < .001), incontinence (p < .001), care group (p = .011), hospital location (p < .001), type of hospitals (p = .004), ages of patients (p < .001) were associations of pressure ulcers from the multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence rate of pressure ulcers in Chinese hospitals was lower than that reported in previous investigations. Specific characteristics of pressure ulcerpatients were as follows: low Braden score, longer expected length of stay, double incontinence, an ICU and a medical ward, hospital location in the Pearl River Delta, a university hospital and an older patient. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The survey could make managers know their prevalence level of pressure ulcers and provide priorities for clinical nurses.