Literature DB >> 28815533

Hijacking of Membrane Contact Sites by Intracellular Bacterial Pathogens.

Isabelle Derré1.   

Abstract

Intracellular bacterial pathogens have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to hijack host cellular processes to promote their survival and replication inside host cells. Over the past two decades, much attention has been given to the strategies employed by these pathogens to manipulate various vesicular trafficking pathways. But in the past 5 years, studies have brought to light that intracellular bacteria also target non-vesicular trafficking pathways. Here we review how three vacuolar pathogens, namely, Legionella, Chlamydia, and Coxiella hijack components of cellular MCS with or without the formation of stable MCS. A common theme in the manipulation of MCS by intracellular bacteria is the dependence on the secretion of bacterial effector proteins. During the early stages of the Legionella life cycle, the bacteria connects otherwise unrelated cellular pathways (i.e., components of ER-PM MCS, PI4KIIIα, and Sac1 and the early secretory pathway) to remodel its nascent vacuole into an ER-like compartment. Chlamydia and Coxiella vacuoles establish direct MCS with the ER and target lipid transfer proteins that contain a FFAT motif, CERT, and ORP1L, respectively, suggesting a common mechanism of VAP-dependent lipid acquisition. Chlamydia also recruits STIM1, an ER calcium sensor involved in store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) at ER-PM MCS, and elucidating the role of STIM1 at ER-Chlamydia inclusion MCS may uncover additional role for these contacts. Altogether, the manipulation of MCS by intracellular bacterial pathogens has open a new and exciting area of research to investigate the molecular mechanisms supporting pathogenesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CERT; Chlamydia; Coxiella; IncD; Legionella; ORP1L; PI4KIIIα; STIM1; Sac1; VAP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815533     DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4567-7_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  5 in total

1.  Phosphoregulation accommodates Type III secretion and assembly of a tether of ER-Chlamydia inclusion membrane contact sites.

Authors:  Rachel J Ende; Rebecca L Murray; Samantha K D'Spain; Isabelle Coppens; Isabelle Derré
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Co-opted Cellular Sac1 Lipid Phosphatase and PI(4)P Phosphoinositide Are Key Host Factors during the Biogenesis of the Tombusvirus Replication Compartment.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Sasvari; Wenwu Lin; Jun-Ichi Inaba; Kai Xu; Nikolay Kovalev; Peter D Nagy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Got mutants? How advances in chlamydial genetics have furthered the study of effector proteins.

Authors:  Shelby E Andersen; Lanci M Bulman; Brianna Steiert; Robert Faris; Mary M Weber
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Differential Effects of Small Molecule Inhibitors on the Intracellular Chlamydia Infection.

Authors:  Karissa J Muñoz; Ming Tan; Christine Sütterlin
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 7.786

5.  The Small Molecule H89 Inhibits Chlamydia Inclusion Growth and Production of Infectious Progeny.

Authors:  Karissa J Muñoz; Kevin Wang; Lauren M Sheehan; Ming Tan; Christine Sütterlin
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.441

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.