| Literature DB >> 28814390 |
Ya-Wen Wang1, Ji-Lei Zhang2, Jian-Gang Jiao1, Xiao-Xia Du2, Samwel Mchele Limbu1,3, Fang Qiao1, Mei-Ling Zhang1, Dong-Liang Li1, Zhen-Yu Du4.
Abstract
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) have different structures and metabolic functions and play different roles in the regulation of the mammal endocrine system. However, little is known about morphology and physiological and metabolic functions between VAT and SCAT in fish. We compared the morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of VAT and SCAT in Nile tilapia and measured their functions in energy intake flux, lipolytic ability, and gene expression patterns. SCAT contained more large adipocytes and nonadipocytes than VAT in Nile tilapia. VAT had higher lipid content and was the primary site for lipid deposition. Conversely, SCAT had higher hormone-induced lipolytic activity. Furthermore, SCAT had a higher percentage of monounsaturated and lower polyunsaturated fatty acids than VAT. SCAT had higher mitochondrial DNA, gene expression for fatty acid β-oxidation, adipogenesis, and brown adipose tissue characteristics, but it also had a lower gene expression for inflammation and adipocyte differentiation than VAT. SCAT and VAT have different morphological structures, as well as physiological and metabolic functions in fish. VAT is the preferable lipid deposition tissue, whereas SCAT exhibits higher lipid catabolic activity than VAT. The physiological functions of SCAT in fish are commonly overlooked. The present study indicates that SCAT has specific metabolic characteristics that differ from VAT. The differences between VAT and SCAT should be considered in future metabolism studies using fish as models, either in biomedical or aquaculture studies.Entities:
Keywords: Nile tilapia; gene expression pattern; metabolism; subcutaneous adipose tissue; visceral adipose tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28814390 DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00071.2017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ISSN: 0363-6119 Impact factor: 3.619