Cason Schmit1,2, Gregory Sunshine1, Dawn Pepin1, Tara Ramanathan3, Akshara Menon1, Matthew Penn3. 1. 1 Chenega Professional and Technical Services, LLC for Public Health Law Program, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. 2 Department of Health Policy & Management, Texas A&M University School of Public Health, College Station, TX, USA. 3. 3 Public Health Law Program, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In all health system sectors, electronic health information (EHI) is created, used, released, and reused. We examined states' efforts to address EHI uses in law to provide an understanding of the EHI legal environment. METHODS: Attorney researchers used WestlawNext to search for EHI-related statutes and regulations of the US states, US territories, and the District of Columbia in effect as of January 2014. The researchers independently catalogued provisions by the EHI use described in the law. Researchers resolved discrepancies through peer review meetings and recorded the consensus codes for each law. RESULTS: This study identified 2364 EHI-related laws representing 49 EHI uses in 54 jurisdictions. A total of 18 EHI uses were regulated by ≥10 jurisdictions. More than 750 laws addressed 2 or more EHI uses. Jurisdictions varied by the number of EHI laws in effect, with a mean of 44 laws. Texas had the most EHI laws (n = 145). Hawaii and South Carolina had the fewest (n = 14 each). CONCLUSIONS: The EHI legal landscape is complex. The large quantity and diversity of laws complicate legal analysis, likely delay implementation of public health solutions, and might be detrimental to the development of emerging health information technology. Research is needed to understand the effect of EHI-related laws.
OBJECTIVES: In all health system sectors, electronic health information (EHI) is created, used, released, and reused. We examined states' efforts to address EHI uses in law to provide an understanding of the EHI legal environment. METHODS: Attorney researchers used WestlawNext to search for EHI-related statutes and regulations of the US states, US territories, and the District of Columbia in effect as of January 2014. The researchers independently catalogued provisions by the EHI use described in the law. Researchers resolved discrepancies through peer review meetings and recorded the consensus codes for each law. RESULTS: This study identified 2364 EHI-related laws representing 49 EHI uses in 54 jurisdictions. A total of 18 EHI uses were regulated by ≥10 jurisdictions. More than 750 laws addressed 2 or more EHI uses. Jurisdictions varied by the number of EHI laws in effect, with a mean of 44 laws. Texas had the most EHI laws (n = 145). Hawaii and South Carolina had the fewest (n = 14 each). CONCLUSIONS: The EHI legal landscape is complex. The large quantity and diversity of laws complicate legal analysis, likely delay implementation of public health solutions, and might be detrimental to the development of emerging health information technology. Research is needed to understand the effect of EHI-related laws.
Keywords:
health information; health information technology; law; regulation
Authors: Charles Safran; Meryl Bloomrosen; W Edward Hammond; Steven Labkoff; Suzanne Markel-Fox; Paul C Tang; Don E Detmer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Deepthi Rajeev; Catherine J Staes; R Scott Evans; Susan Mottice; Robert Rolfs; Matthew H Samore; Jon Whitney; Richard Kurzban; Stanley M Huff Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William Gardner; Suzanne Morton; Aldo Tinoco; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Benjamin D Canan; Kelly J Kelleher Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Paul C Tang; Mary Ralston; Michelle Fernandez Arrigotti; Lubna Qureshi; Justin Graham Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Michael S Calderwood; Richard Platt; Xuanlin Hou; Jessica Malenfant; Gillian Haney; Benjamin Kruskal; Ross Lazarus; Michael Klompas Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Joshua M Pevnick; Maria Claver; Aram Dobalian; Steven M Asch; Harris R Stutman; Alan Tomines; Paul Fu Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2010-05-22 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Jyotishman Pathak; Gyorgy Simon; Dingcheng Li; Joanna M Biernacka; Gregory J Jenkins; Christopher G Chute; Daniel K Hall-Flavin; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2014-04-07