Literature DB >> 28813235

Temporary Hearing Threshold Shift in Healthy Volunteers with Hearing Protection Caused by Acoustic Noise Exposure during 3-T Multisequence MR Neuroimaging.

Chao Jin1, Huan Li1, Xianjun Li1, Miaomiao Wang1, Congcong Liu1, Jianxin Guo1, Jian Yang1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether a single 51-minute exposure to acoustic noise during 3-T multisequence magnetic resonance (MR) neuroimaging could affect the hearing threshold of healthy adults with earplugs and sponge mats as hearing protection. Materials and Methods With earplugs and motion-refraining sponge mats as hearing protection, 26 healthy young adults underwent 3-T MR neuroimaging imaging that included T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence, T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence, diffusion-tensor imaging, diffusion-kurtosis imaging, T2*-weighted three-dimensional multiecho gradient-echo sequence, and blood oxygen level-dependent imaging. Automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used to measure the hearing thresholds within 24 hours before, within 20 minutes after, and 25 days after the MR examination. One-way repeated-measure analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment was used to compare automated ABR results among the three tests and partial η2 (ηp2) was reported as a measure of effect size. Results Automated ABR results showed significantly increased mean threshold shift of 5.0 dB ± 8.1 (standard deviation) (left ear: 4.8 dB ± 9.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.09, 8.53], ηp2 = 0.221, P = .013; right ear: 5.2 dB ± 6.9 [95% confidence interval: 2.36, 8.02], ηp2 = 0.364, P = .001) immediately after the MR examination compared with the baseline study. This shift is below the temporary threshold shift of 40-50 dB that is associated with cochlea nerve changes. Automated ABR obtained at day 25 after MR imaging showed no significant differences from baseline (left ear: -2.3 dB ± 8.6 [95% confidence interval: -5.79, 1.78], ηp2 = 0.069, P = .185; right ear: 0.4 dB ± 7.3 [95% confidence interval: -3.35, 2.58], ηp2 = 0.003, P = .791). Conclusion A 3-T MR neuroimaging examination with the acoustic noise at equivalent sound pressure level of 103.5-111.3 dBA lasting 51 minutes can cause temporary hearing threshold shift in healthy volunteers with hearing protection. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28813235     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Silent susceptibility-weighted angiography to detect hemorrhagic lesions in the brain: a clinical and phantom study.

Authors:  Takuya Fujiwara; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Hisashi Tanaka; Hiroto Takahashi; Chisato Matsuo; Masahiro Fujiwara; Tetsuya Wakayama; Pauline Worters; Christopher J Hardy; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Dissociation between Cerebellar and Cerebral Neural Activities in Humans with Long-Term Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Xiao-Min Xu; Yun Jiao; Tian-Yu Tang; Jian Zhang; Chun-Qiang Lu; Ying Luan; Richard Salvi; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Hearing Thresholds Changes after MRI 1.5T of Head and Neck.

Authors:  Maryam Bahaloo; Mohammad Hossein Davari; Mohammad Sobhan; Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi; Mohammad Taghi Jalalian; Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Farimah Shamsi; Sam Mirfendereski; Abolfazl Mollasadeghi; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-06-17

4.  A low-cost and shielding-free ultra-low-field brain MRI scanner.

Authors:  Yilong Liu; Alex T L Leong; Yujiao Zhao; Linfang Xiao; Henry K F Mak; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gary K K Lau; Gilberto K K Leung; Ed X Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Does 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have Adverse Effect on Cochlear Functions?

Authors:  Ugur Yildirim; Ozgur Kemal; Muzaffer Elmali; Figen Basar
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Software-based noise reduction in cranial magnetic resonance imaging: Influence on image quality.

Authors:  Philipp Fuelkell; Soenke Langner; Nele Friedrich; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Christoph G Radosa; Ivan Platzek; Birger Mensel; Jens-Peter Kühn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of Audiovestibular Symptoms Following Exposure to Acoustic and Electromagnetic Energy Outside Conventional Human Hearing.

Authors:  Rory J Lubner; Neil S Kondamuri; Renata M Knoll; Bryan K Ward; Philip D Littlefield; Derek Rodgers; Kalil G Abdullah; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.