Literature DB >> 2881302

Stereoscopic mechanisms: binocular responses of the striate cells of cats to moving light and dark bars.

R Maske, S Yamane, P O Bishop.   

Abstract

New knowledge concerning the internal structure and response properties of the receptive fields of striate cells calls for a fresh appraisal of their binocular interactions in the interest of a better understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying binocular depth discrimination. Binocular position-disparity response profiles were recorded from 71 simple and B-cells in response to moving light and dark bars. Predominantly excitatory (PE) cells (N = 48) had disparity response profiles that were spatially closely similar to their respective monocular responses. In addition, the centrally located excitatory subregions were flanked on one or both sides by non-specific inhibitory regions. PE cells with a preferred stimulus orientation within 30 degrees of the vertical (N = 17) showed binocular facilitations with maximal values that were always more than twice (mean 3.3) the sum of the two monocular responses to the same stimuli and generally greater than the facilitations shown by cells with orientations more than 30 degrees from the vertical (N = 29; mean 2.2 times the sum of the respective monocular responses). The strength of the binocular facilitation depended on the stimulus contrast, the facilitation decreasing with increasing contrast. The receptive-field disparity distribution of the 31 PE cells capable of making significant horizontal disparity discriminations has standard deviations of 0.37 degrees and 0.40 degrees, respectively. Predominantly inhibitory cells (PI) (N = 23) showed two basic types of disparity response profile: symmetric (N = 17) and asymmetric (N = 6). Uncertainty regarding the precise location of the binocular fixation point in the anaesthetized and paralysed preparation made it difficult to categorize PI cells adequately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2881302     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1986.0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0950-1193


  7 in total

1.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.

Authors:  Babür Sahinoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Binocular interaction and disparity coding at the 17-18 border: contribution of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  F Lepore; A Samson; M C Paradis; M Ptito; J P Guillemot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Binocular interactions and disparity coding in area 21a of cat extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  C Wang; B Dreher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Binocular interaction and disparity coding in area 19 of visual cortex in normal and split-chiasm cats.

Authors:  J P Guillemot; M C Paradis; A Samson; M Ptito; L Richer; F Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.