Literature DB >> 28812693

Direct benefits and evolutionary transitions to complex societies.

Cody J Dey1,2, Constance M O'Connor1, Holly Wilkinson3, Susanne Shultz3, Sigal Balshine1, John L Fitzpatrick3,4.   

Abstract

The selective forces that drive the evolution of cooperation have been intensely debated. Evolutionary transitions to cooperative breeding, a complex form of cooperation, have been hypothesized to be linked to low degrees of promiscuity, which increases intragroup relatedness and the indirect (that is, kin selected) benefits of helping. However, ecological factors also promote cooperative breeding, and may be more important than relatedness in some contexts. Identifying the key evolutionary drivers of cooperative breeding therefore requires an integrated assessment of these hypotheses. Here we show, using a phylogenetic framework that explicitly evaluates mating behaviours and ecological factors, that evolutionary transitions to cooperative breeding in cichlid fishes were not associated with social monogamy. Instead, group living, biparental care and diet type directly favoured the evolution of cooperative breeding. Our results suggest that cichlid fishes exhibit an alternative path to the evolution of complex societies compared to other previously studied vertebrates, and these transitions are driven primarily by direct fitness benefits.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28812693     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  5 in total

1.  Age- and sex-dependent variation in relatedness corresponds to reproductive skew, territory inheritance, and workload in cooperatively breeding cichlids.

Authors:  Dario Josi; Dik Heg; Tomohiro Takeyama; Danielle Bonfils; Dmitry A Konovalov; Joachim G Frommen; Masanori Kohda; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Live bearing promotes the evolution of sociality in reptiles.

Authors:  Ben Halliwell; Tobias Uller; Barbara R Holland; Geoffrey M While
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Isotocin neuronal phenotypes differ among social systems in cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Adam R Reddon; Constance M O'Connor; Erin Nesjan; Jason Cameron; Jennifer K Hellmann; Isaac Y Ligocki; Susan E Marsh-Rollo; Ian M Hamilton; Douglas R Wylie; Peter L Hurd; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Inclusive fitness benefits mitigate costs of cuckoldry to socially paired males.

Authors:  Aneesh P H Bose; Jonathan M Henshaw; Holger Zimmermann; Karoline Fritzsche; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Evolutionary transitions toward pair living in nonhuman primates as stepping stones toward more complex societies.

Authors:  Peter M Kappeler; Luca Pozzi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.