Literature DB >> 28811851

Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in Rural Upstate New York, 2011 - 2016.

Saeeda Fatima1, Benajmin Dao1, Ayesha Jameel1, Konika Sharma1, David Strogatz2, Melissa Scribani2, Harish Raj Seetha Rammohan3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) depends on a number of host factors whose prevalence can vary globally. The usual patient population affected by IE is sicker and older, often with many comorbid conditions. The risk is growing in younger populations due to the emerging epidemic of intravenous (IV) drug use. We have performed a temporal trend analysis of various factors of IE in the rural counties covering a major part of central Upstate New York.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of patients who were admitted in a tertiary care hospital in rural Upstate New York and diagnosed with IE from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016. Forty-five patients were identified with definite IE and nine with possible IE.
RESULTS: Total incidence of IE was 3.5 cases per 100,000 person years in the total population and 4.4 if we consider total population ≥ 18 years in the denominator. A significant (P = 0.022) increase in incidence of IE from 2011 to 2016 was seen by univariate analysis. Incidence was higher in males (P = 0.029) and for those aged 65 or older (P = 0.0003). IV drug use among cases is noted to be more prevalent in 2015 and 2016 compared to previous years.
CONCLUSION: In this study of patients in a rural region of New York, an increase in the incidence of IE was seen over the study period with changes in patient characteristics and etiology over this time. We speculate that an increase in IV drug use could be a leading factor in the recent and future increased incidence of IE in the area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Infective endocarditis; Intravenous drug use

Year:  2017        PMID: 28811851      PMCID: PMC5544479          DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3131w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1918-3003


Introduction

The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) depends on a number of host factors whose prevalence can vary globally. Yearly incidence is about 3 - 10 per 100,000 people [1]. Several factors have impacted the clinical spectrum of IE including decreased incidence of rheumatic carditis, increased use of intra-cardiac devices, emerging population of high-risk patients (including hemodialysis, intravenous (IV) drug users, and diabetes) as well as improved diagnostic tools and management of IE [2]. The usual patient population affected by IE is sicker and older, often with many comorbid conditions. The risk is growing in younger populations due to the emerging epidemic of IV drug use. We have performed a temporal trend analysis of various factors of IE in the rural counties covering a major part of central Upstate New York.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of patients who were admitted in a tertiary care hospital in rural Upstate New York and diagnosed with IE from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016. Five counties of Upstate New York are covered by this tertiary care center: Otsego, Herkimer, Delaware, Chenango and Schoharie Counties. All patients over 18 years of age admitted with diagnosis of IE (ICD-10 codes 133.0) were included in the study. A total of 54 patients were identified and admitted during this time period. For each of these cases, the medical records were thoroughly reviewed to verify possible and definite IE according to the modified Duke’s criteria [3]. Forty-five patients were identified with definite IE and nine with possible IE. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and outcome data were collected using a standardized data collection form with detailed definition of variables. Death information at 6 months was obtained from the electronic medical record. The definitions of community-acquired, nosocomial, and health care-associated infections were described by Correa de Sa et al [4] and we followed the same definitions. This study was approved by the Bassett Institutional Review Board. Statistical analyses included linear regression and the z-test for comparing incidence rates. For estimating incidence rates, the total population of the above mentioned counties between the years 2011 and 2016 was considered to be at risk, with counts of age-, sex-, and calendar time-specific strata in the denominator enumerated from the collective annual census data of the 6 years (2011 - 2016). All analyses were performed using the statistical programming language SAS.

Results

Total incidence of IE was 3.5 cases per 100,000 person years (Fig. 1) in the total population and 4.4 if we consider total population ≥ 18 years in the denominator. From a univariate analysis there was significant (P = 0.022) increase in incidence of IE from 2011 to 2016. Using the z-test for comparing incidence rates, incidence was higher in males (P = 0.029) and for those aged 65 or older (P = 0.0003) (Figs. 2 and 3). IV drug use among cases is noted to be more prevalent in 2015 and 2016 compared to previous years (Table 1). Other common predisposing conditions include previous IE (22.2%), history of cardiac surgery (29.6%) and implantable intra-cardiac device (14.8%). There was just one case of rheumatic carditis and no cases of mitral valve prolapse.
Figure 1

Total incidence of IE from 2011 to 2016.

Figure 2

Incidence of IE in population 18 years and older from 2011 to 2016.

Figure 3

Incidence of IE in population 65 years and older from 2011 to 2016.

Table 1

Incidence of IE From 2011 to 2016 in IV Drug Users

Year of admissionNumber of cases diagnosed with IENumber of cases with reported IV drug usePercentage (%) of cases using IV drugs
20116116.7
20125120
20139111.1
2014800
201514642.9
201612433.3
Total incidence of IE from 2011 to 2016. Incidence of IE in population 18 years and older from 2011 to 2016. Incidence of IE in population 65 years and older from 2011 to 2016. Clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Comorbidities associated with IE include diabetes 38.8%, distant infections 22.2%, pre-existing valvular heart disease 28.8%, heart failure 20.4%, atrial fibrillation 24.07% and renal insufficiency 24.1% with 12.9% dialysis-dependent population. Infection site of acquisition was predominantly community-acquired (79.6%), with some additional healthcare-associated cases (16.7%) and only two cases of nosocomial. Of the cases, 72.2% had native valve IE, with 48% having mitral valve involvement and 22.2% having aortic valve involvement. There were seven cases (12.9%) with prosthetic valve-associated IE. Although involvement of the pulmonary valve is rarely seen, several cases were identified in this small cohort (5.5%; n = 3).
Table 2

Characteristics of Patients

VariablesIE, 2011 - 2016, n = 54
Demographics
  Age, median years (range)61.5 (21 - 93)
  Female gender19 (35%)
  Race (Caucasian)54 (100%)
Diagnosis
  Definite IE45 (85%)
  Possible IE9 (14%)
Comorbidities
  Diabetes mellitus21 (38.8%)
  HIV1 (1.85%)
  Neoplasm6 (11.1%)
  Other immunosuppressed states2 (3.7%)
  Valvular heart disease15 (28.8%)
  Heart failure11 (20.4%)
  Bicuspid aortic valve1 (1.85%)
  Atrial fibrillation13 (24.07%)
  Distant infections12 (22.2%)
  Pulmonary disease11 (20.37%)
  Renal insufficiency13 (24.1%)
    Dialysis dependent7 (12.9%)
Predisposing factor
  Rheumatic heart disease1 (1.85%)
  Mitral valve prolapse0
  IV drug use13 (24.1%)
  Previous cardiac surgery16 (29.6%)
  Congenital heart disease1 (2.38 %)
  Previous IE12 (22.2%)
  Implantable intra-cardiac device8 (14.8%)
  Central venous line6 (11.1%)
Affected valve
  Native valve39 (72.2%)
  Prosthetic valve7 (12.9%)
  Lead infection8 (14.8%)
  Aortic12 (22.2%)
  Mitral26 (48%)
  Tricuspid7 (12.9%)
  Pulmonary3 (5.5%)
Site of acquisition
  Community acquired43 (79.6%)
  Nosocomial2 (3.7%)
  Healthcare associated9 (16.7%)
Causative organism
  S. aureus21 (38.3%)
  MSSA14 (66.6%)
  MRSA7 (33.3%)
  Coagulase negative Staph6 (11%)
  Streptococcus species9 (16.6%)
  Enterococcus9(16.6%)
  Culture negative6 (11%)
  Others3 (5.5%)
Outcomes
  Median length of stay11
  In-hospital death3 (5.5%)
  6-month mortality5 (9.2%)
  Valve surgery indicated (within 6 weeks)15 (27.7%)
  Valve surgery indicated (6 week to 1 year)3 (5.5%)
  Valve surgery performed (within 6 weeks)8 (14.8%)
  Valve surgery performed (6 week to 1 year)4 (7.4%)
Microbiology and clinical outcomes are also summarized in Table 2. Of the 54 cases, 21 (38.3%) were due to Staphylococcus aureus, nine (16.6%) were streptococci, nine (16.6%) from enterococcus species, six (11%) were coagulase negative, six (11%) were culture negative and none were due to the HACEK (Hemophilus species, Aggregatibacter species, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species) group. Among the staphylococcus, seven cases were methicillin-resistant. Of the 54 cases of IE, 18 patients (33.3%) had indication for surgery. Fifteen (27.7%) patients needed surgery within 6 weeks, but only eight patients underwent surgery in the first 6-week period. Other patients had surgery after 6 weeks’ period. Patients who did not have surgery (n = 6) were either deemed too high risk or refused the procedure. In-hospital death rate was 5.5% and 6-month mortality was 9.2%. Median length of stay was calculated 11 days.

Discussion

Understanding the epidemiologic trends of IE is important in its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Our study period is after changes in the prevention of IE guidelines that were revised in 2007, so our time trends are not likely to be affected by this transition. The overall incidence of IE in the area appeared to be similar to that of the United States [5, 6]. A significant increase in IE was observed within the community during the study period. An increase in IV drug use among cases is also observed in the last 2 years of study period, which reflects an important behavioral pattern in this and other rural communities [7-9]. Staphylococcus aureus has become the predominant causative organism in the developed world. This can be attributed to the increase in risk factors in the population including older age, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, intra-cardiac device, increased use of invasive procedures and IV drug use [10]. It remained the predominant pathogen in community-acquired and healthcare-related endocarditis and can lead to an aggressive form of disease [11]. There is a general decreasing trend in nosocomial endocarditis in the United States and similar results are seen in our study. This decrease coincided with coordinated efforts to reduce hospital-acquired infections through evidence-based consensus guidelines, bundled interventions, and public reporting [12, 13]. We observed a lower proportion of patients undergoing surgery, in-hospital and 6-month mortality as compared to other studies [1, 5]. Our study has several limitations. Although the tertiary care hospital in this study is the major hospital located within the five county rural regions, referral bias is possible if some IE patients were admitted to hospitals in other nearby counties [14, 15]. There are no standard codes to identify skilled home nursing care and wound care, which are normally included in the definition of health care-associated infection; consequently, the number of health care-associated infections could have been underestimated. The population is predominantly Caucasian, rural middle to low socioeconomic class which may make our study less generalizable to more urban and racially diverse populations. Information regarding death was acquired from the electronic medical record and was not confirmed by the state health department. This may have resulted in underestimation of mortality.

Conclusion

In this study of patients in a rural region of New York, an increase in the incidence of IE was seen over the study period with changes in patient characteristics and etiology over this time. In general, male gender and older age were associated with increased IE risk. We speculate that an increase in IV drug use could be a leading factor in the recent and future increased incidence of IE in the area.
  12 in total

1.  Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Authors:  J S Li; D J Sexton; N Mick; R Nettles; V G Fowler; T Ryan; T Bashore; G R Corey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; David R Calkins; C Joseph McCannon; Andrew D Hackbarth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Influence of referral bias on the clinical characteristics of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection.

Authors:  M N Al-Hasan; J E Eckel-Passow; L M Baddour
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Sadip Pant; Nileshkumar J Patel; Abhishek Deshmukh; Harsh Golwala; Nilay Patel; Apurva Badheka; Glenn A Hirsch; Jawahar L Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Epidemiological trends of infective endocarditis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  Daniel D Correa de Sa; Imad M Tleyjeh; Nandan S Anavekar; Jason C Schultz; Justin M Thomas; Brian D Lahr; Alok Bachuwar; Michal Pazdernik; James M Steckelberg; Walter R Wilson; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Evaluating the impact of mandatory public reporting on participation and performance in a program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections: evidence from a national patient safety collaborative.

Authors:  Jill A Marsteller; Yea-Jen Hsu; Kristina Weeks
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  The burden of Staphylococcus aureus infections on hospitals in the United States: an analysis of the 2000 and 2001 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.

Authors:  Gary A Noskin; Robert J Rubin; Jerome J Schentag; Jan Kluytmans; Edwin C Hedblom; Maartje Smulders; Elizabeth Lapetina; Eric Gemmen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Aug 8-22

Review 8.  Infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Thomas J Cahill; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Health care-associated native valve endocarditis: importance of non-nosocomial acquisition.

Authors:  Natividad Benito; José M Miró; Elisa de Lazzari; Christopher H Cabell; Ana del Río; Javier Altclas; Patrick Commerford; Francois Delahaye; Stefan Dragulescu; Helen Giamarellou; Gilbert Habib; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; A Sampath Kumar; Francisco M Nacinovich; Fredy Suter; Christophe Tribouilloy; Krishnan Venugopal; Asuncion Moreno; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Infective endocarditis epidemiology over five decades: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leandro Slipczuk; J Nicolas Codolosa; Carlos D Davila; Abel Romero-Corral; Jeong Yun; Gregg S Pressman; Vincent M Figueredo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and outcomes of infection-associated glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Anjali A Satoskar; Samir V Parikh; Tibor Nadasdy
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Staphylococcal Enterotoxins and Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1 and Their Association among Bacteremic and Infective Endocarditis Patients in Egypt.

Authors:  Heba M Elsherif; Zeinab H Helal; Mona R El-Ansary; Zeinab A Fahmy; Wafaa N Eltayeb; Sahar Radwan; Khaled M Aboshanab
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.