Literature DB >> 28811794

Comparing the effects of two different contact lenses on corneal re-epithelialization after corneal collagen cross-linking.

Yusuf Kocluk1, Savas Cetinkaya2, Emine Alyamac Sukgen3, Murat Günay4, Alper Mete5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether keratoconus (KC) patients who applied the corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and two different contact lens (CL) showed any differences in complaints and findings following the CXL.
METHODS: This prospective, comparative, double-blind clinical study involved 60 eyes of 60 patients (38 female and 22 male). At the end of the CXL procedure, CL (Balafilcon A) was inserted in 29 patients (Group-1) while CL with different material content (Hioxifilcon A) designed for therapeutic/bandage purposes were inserted in 31 patients (Group-2).
RESULTS: On the 1st and 3th day after the CXL, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the postoperative symptoms. On the 3th day after the CXL, all cases of both two groups were found to complete the corneal re-epithelialization. There was more PE ratio in the patients who had allergic conjunctivitis.
CONCLUSIONS: With the use of Balafilcon A and Hioxifilcon A lens materials, KC patients who underwent the CXL were found to have similar symptoms and clinical findings after the CXL. However, epithelial staining and PE were observed more in KC cases accompanied by allergic conjunctivitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergic conjunctivitis; Bandage contact lens; Corneal collagen cross-linking; Corneal re-epithelialization; Keratoconus

Year:  2017        PMID: 28811794      PMCID: PMC5510126          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.333.12241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


  21 in total

1.  Corneal collagen crosslinking for corneal ectasia of post-LASIK: one-year results.

Authors:  Gang Li; Zheng-Jun Fan; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Safety and efficacy of transepithelial crosslinking (C3-R/CXL).

Authors:  Brian S Boxer Wachler; Roberto Pinelli; Aylin Ertan; Colin C K Chan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Keratoconus: a review.

Authors:  Miguel Romero-Jiménez; Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 4.  Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Mireya Diaz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Review: keratoconus in Asia.

Authors:  Yee Onn Kok; Grace Feng Ling Tan; Seng Chee Loon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Scleral contact lenses may help where other modalities fail.

Authors:  Ori Segal; Yaniv Barkana; Dafna Hourovitz; Shmuel Behrman; Yifaa Kamun; Isaac Avni; David Zadok
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defect with extended wear of a fluid-ventilated gas-permeable scleral contact lens.

Authors:  P Rosenthal; J M Cotter; J Baum
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Masked comparison of silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A extended-wear bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Andrew T Engle; John M Laurent; Steven C Schallhorn; Steven D Toman; James S Newacheck; David J Tanzer; James L Tidwell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  A Plaka; M A Grentzelos; N I Astyrakakis; G D Kymionis; I G Pallikaris; S Plainis
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK.

Authors:  Raquel Gil-Cazorla; Miguel A Teus; Esther Arranz-Márquez
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.