| Literature DB >> 28811410 |
Xiaodong Wang1, Guangming Wu2, Bin Zhou3, Jun Shen4.
Abstract
Titanium oxide coatings have been deposited by the sol-gel dip-coating method. Crystallization of titanium oxide coatings was then achieved through thermal annealing at temperatures above 400 °C. The structural properties and surface morphology of the crystallized coatings were studied by micro-Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy, respectively. Characterization technique, based on least-square fitting to the measured reflectance and transmittance spectra, is used to determine the refractive indices of the crystallized TiO₂ coatings. The stability of the synthesized sol was also investigated by dynamic light scattering particle size analyzer. The influence of the thermal annealing on the optical properties was then discussed. The increase in refractive index with high temperature thermal annealing process was observed, obtaining refractive index values from 1.98 to 2.57 at He-Ne laser wavelength of 633 nm. The Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy studies indicate that the index variation is due to the changes in crystalline phase, density, and morphology during thermal annealing.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2 coating; optical constants; sol-gel; thermal annealing
Year: 2013 PMID: 28811410 PMCID: PMC5521283 DOI: 10.3390/ma6072819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Flow chart of TiO2 sol synthesis process.
Figure 2Raman spectra of TiO2 coatings annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 3Transmittance spectra of TiO2 coatings annealed at different temperatures.
Caculated optical parameters of TiO2 coatings.
| Sample | Thickness | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400 °C | 1.892 | 0.036 | 5.701 × 10−4 | 3.508 × 10−3 | 1.538 × 10−15 | 2.567 × 10−10 | 96.46 | 0.4452 |
| 500 °C | 1.958 | 0.040 | 1.704 × 10−3 | 5.757 × 10−3 | 2.629 × 10−13 | 7.540 × 10−13 | 89.94 | 0.6306 |
| 600 °C | 1.996 | 0.035 | 3.921 × 10−15 | 7.965 × 10−3 | 2.280 × 10−9 | 1.259 × 10−9 | 86.87 | 0.5689 |
| 700 °C | 2.127 | 0.051 | 1.255 × 10−3 | 8.741 × 10−3 | 2.054 × 10−12 | 4.287 × 10−9 | 70.70 | 0.4936 |
| 800 °C | 2.401 | 0.023 | 0.010 | 2.987 × 10−3 | 4.708 × 10−3 | 4.310 × 10−4 | 61.81 | 0.8760 |
| 900 °C | 2.385 | 0.063 | 4.707 × 10−3 | 0.011 | 5.985 × 10−11 | 1.102 × 10−3 | 61.02 | 0.3872 |
Figure 4Refractive index dispersion of TiO2 coatings annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 5Plot of (αhν)1/m vs. (hν) for the estimation of the band gap energy value (400 °C annealed TiO2 coating): (a) indirect gap and (b) direct gap.
Band gap of TiO2 coatings annealed at different temperatures.
| Sample/°C | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.22 | 3.17 | 3.15 | 3.09 | 2.97 | 2.93 | |
| 3.86 | 3.82 | 3.79 | 3.77 | 3.67 | 3.65 |
Figure 62D AFM images of TiO2 coatings annealed at (a) 300 °C; (b) 500 °C; (c) 700 °C; (d) 900 °C.
Figure 7Particle size distribution of TiO2 sol.