Literature DB >> 28811336

Catastrophic Unbalanced Genome Rearrangements Cause Somatic Loss of Berry Color in Grapevine.

Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano1, Carolina Royo2, Rafael Torres-Pérez2, Jérôme Grimplet2, Lucie Fernandez3, José Manuel Franco-Zorrilla4, Diego Lijavetzky5, Elisa Baroja2, Juana Martínez2, Enrique García-Escudero2, Javier Ibáñez2, José Miguel Martínez-Zapater2.   

Abstract

Grape (Vitis vinifera) color somatic variants that can be used to develop new grapevine cultivars occasionally appear associated with deletion events of uncertain origin. To understand the mutational mechanisms generating somatic structural variation in grapevine, we compared the Tempranillo Blanco (TB) white berry somatic variant with its black berry ancestor, Tempranillo Tinto. Whole-genome sequencing uncovered a catastrophic genome rearrangement in TB that caused the hemizygous deletion of 313 genes, including the loss of the functional copy for the MYB transcription factors required for anthocyanin pigmentation in the berry skin. Loss of heterozygosity and decreased copy number delimited interspersed monosomic and disomic regions in the right arm of linkage groups 2 and 5. At least 11 validated clustered breakpoints involving intrachromosomal and interchromosomal translocations between three linkage groups flanked the deleted fragments, which, according to segregation analyses, are phased in a single copy of each of the affected chromosomes. These hallmarks, along with the lack of homology between breakpoint joins and the randomness of the order and orientation of the rearranged fragments, are all consistent with a chromothripsis-like pattern generated after chromosome breakage and illegitimate rejoining. This unbalanced genome reshuffling has additional consequences in reproductive development. In TB, lack of sexual transmission of rearranged chromosomes associates with low gamete viability, which compromises fruit set and decreases fruit production. Our findings show that catastrophic genome rearrangements arise spontaneously and stabilize during plant somatic growth. These dramatic rearrangements generate new interesting phenotypes that can be selected for the improvement of vegetatively propagated plant species.
© 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28811336      PMCID: PMC5619900          DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.00715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  66 in total

1.  Association of dwarfism and floral induction with a grape 'green revolution' mutation.

Authors:  Paul K Boss; Mark R Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Stability of Broken Ends of Chromosomes in Zea Mays.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1941-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes.

Authors:  Amanda R Walker; Elizabeth Lee; Jochen Bogs; Debra A J McDavid; Mark R Thomas; Simon P Robinson
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Chromothripsis: breakage-fusion-bridge over and over again.

Authors:  Carlos Oscar Sánchez Sorzano; Alberto Pascual-Montano; Ainhoa Sánchez de Diego; Carlos Martínez-A; Karel H M van Wely
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  An extensive study of the genetic diversity within seven French wine grape variety collections.

Authors:  Frédérique Pelsy; Stéphanie Hocquigny; Ximena Moncada; Gérard Barbeau; Dominique Forget; Patricio Hinrichsen; Didier Merdinoglu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: The adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants.

Authors:  Thomas G Whitham; C N Slobodchikoff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes.

Authors:  Jan O Korbel; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Inter-varietal structural variation in grapevine genomes.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Cardone; Pietro D'Addabbo; Can Alkan; Carlo Bergamini; Claudia Rita Catacchio; Fabio Anaclerio; Giorgia Chiatante; Annamaria Marra; Giuliana Giannuzzi; Rocco Perniola; Mario Ventura; Donato Antonacci
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Selective Y centromere inactivation triggers chromosome shattering in micronuclei and repair by non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Peter Ly; Levi S Teitz; Dong H Kim; Ofer Shoshani; Helen Skaletsky; Daniele Fachinetti; David C Page; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Development of user-friendly functional molecular markers for VvDXS gene conferring muscat flavor in grapevine.

Authors:  F Emanuelli; M Sordo; S Lorenzi; J Battilana; M S Grando
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.589

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Is Tempranillo Blanco Grapevine Different from Tempranillo Tinto Only in the Color of the Grapes? An Updated Review.

Authors:  Tefide Kizildeniz; Inmaculada Pascual; Ghislaine Hilbert; Juan José Irigoyen; Fermín Morales
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Somatic variations led to the selection of acidic and acidless orange cultivars.

Authors:  Lun Wang; Yue Huang; ZiAng Liu; Jiaxian He; Xiaolin Jiang; Fa He; Zhihao Lu; Shuizhi Yang; Peng Chen; Huiwen Yu; Bin Zeng; Lingjun Ke; Zongzhou Xie; Robert M Larkin; Dong Jiang; Ray Ming; Edward S Buckler; Xiuxin Deng; Qiang Xu
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 15.793

3.  Whole-genome sequencing and SNV genotyping of 'Nebbiolo' (Vitis vinifera L.) clones.

Authors:  Giorgio Gambino; Alessandra Dal Molin; Paolo Boccacci; Andrea Minio; Walter Chitarra; Carla Giuseppina Avanzato; Paola Tononi; Irene Perrone; Stefano Raimondi; Anna Schneider; Mario Pezzotti; Franco Mannini; Ivana Gribaudo; Massimo Delledonne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Linking Terpene Synthases to Sesquiterpene Metabolism in Grapevine Flowers.

Authors:  Samuel Jacobus Smit; Melané Alethea Vivier; Philip Richard Young
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Distinct Metabolic Signals Underlie Clone by Environment Interplay in "Nebbiolo" Grapes Over Ripening.

Authors:  Chiara Pagliarani; Paolo Boccacci; Walter Chitarra; Emanuela Cosentino; Marco Sandri; Irene Perrone; Alessia Mori; Danila Cuozzo; Luca Nerva; Marzia Rossato; Paola Zuccolotto; Mario Pezzotti; Massimo Delledonne; Franco Mannini; Ivana Gribaudo; Giorgio Gambino
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  Chromoanagenesis: a piece of the macroevolution scenario.

Authors:  Franck Pellestor; Vincent Gatinois
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Genetic analysis of a white-to-red berry skin color reversion and its transcriptomic and metabolic consequences in grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Moscatel Galego').

Authors:  Vanessa Ferreira; José Tomás Matus; Olinda Pinto-Carnide; David Carrasco; Rosa Arroyo-García; Isaura Castro
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  A new image-based tool for the high throughput phenotyping of pollen viability: evaluation of inter- and intra-cultivar diversity in grapevine.

Authors:  Javier Tello; María Ignacia Montemayor; Astrid Forneck; Javier Ibáñez
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.993

9.  Attention sports fans! The far-reaching contributions of bud sport mutants to horticulture and plant biology.

Authors:  Toshi M Foster; Maria José Aranzana
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.793

Review 10.  Order Through Disorder: The Characteristic Variability of Systems.

Authors:  Yaron Ilan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.