| Literature DB >> 28810828 |
Arabinda Mahanty1,2, Gopal Krishna Purohit2, Sasmita Mohanty3, Nihar Ranjan Nayak4, Bimal Prasanna Mohanty5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High ambient temperature is known to affect fish gonadal development and physiology in a variety of ways depending on the severity and duration of exposure; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Gonadal gene expression influence the gonadal development, physiology and the quality of egg/sperm produced in teleosts and the mechanistic understanding of spatio-temporal changes in the gonadal gene expression could be instrumental in controlling the fate of egg/sperm and the quality of seed produced. Real time-quantititative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qCR), is a high throughput, sensitive and reproducible methodology used for understanding gene expression patterns by measuring the relative abundance of mRNA transcripts. However, its accuracy relies upon a suitable reference gene whose expression levels remain stable across various experimental conditions. In the present study, we evaluated the suitability of ten potential reference genes to be used as internal controls in RT-qPCR analysis in gonadal tissues (ovary and testis) of minnow Puntius sophore exposed to high temperature stress for different time periods (7 days, 60 days). Expression analysis of ten different constitutively expressed genes viz. 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA), beta actin (βactin), β-2 microglobulin (b2mg), eukaryotic elongation factor-1 (eef1), glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (g6pd), ribosomal binding protein L13 (rpl13), tubulin (tub), tata box binding protein (tbp), ubiquitin (ubi) was carried out by using RT-qPCR and the stability in their expressions were evaluated by using four different algorithms; namely, delta Ct, BestKeeper, geNorm and NormFinder.Entities:
Keywords: Puntius sophore; RT-qPCR; Reference genes; Reproductive physiology; Thermal stress
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28810828 PMCID: PMC5557063 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3974-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Cq values of different candidate reference genes in ovary and testis tissues of Puntius sophore (control and heat stressed for 7/60 days)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ovary | ||||||||||
| Control | 20.49 ± 0.14 | 21.15 ± 0.05 | 14.36 ± 0.09 | 16.43 ± 0.3 | 36.65 ± 0.12 | 16.48 ± 0.22 | 17.39 ± 0.12 | 33.02 ± 0.03 | 14.76 ± 0.16 | 19.85 ± 0.27 |
| 7 days heat stressed | 20.43 ± 0.17 | 21.59 ± 0.30 | 15.48 ± 0.30 | 21.40 ± 0.17 | 37.44 ± 0.23 | 15.74 ± 0.08 | 16.61 ± 0.18 | 33.39 ± 0.08 | 29.31 ± 0.08 | 19.75 ± 0.05 |
| 60 days heat stressed | 20.44 ± 0.18 | 22.37 ± 0.10 | 11.39 ± 0.26 | 25.40 ± 0.17 | 31.51 ± 0.13 | 10.12 ± 0.03 | 16.36 ± 0.33 | 35.42 ± 0.21 | 18.59 ± 0.35 | 17.23 ± 0.08 |
| Testis | ||||||||||
| Control | 23.47 ± 0.31 | 25.62 ± 0.25 | 20.57 ± 0.30 | 15.60 ± 0.15 | 36.45 ± 3.42 | 16.65 ± 0.22 | 23.72 ± 4.70 | 28.66 ± 0.18 | 38.63 ± 0.17 | 35.62 ± 0.26 |
| 7 days heat stressed | 23.78 ± 0.10 | 25.41 ± 0.15 | 15.43 ± 0.15 | 17.78 ± 0.19 | 30.38 ± 0.10 | 10.26 ± 0.13 | 26.85 ± 0.19 | 27.36 ± 0.18 | 26.50 ± 0.12 | 38.54 ± 0.20 |
| 60 days heat stressed | 20.50 ± 0.21 | 25.90 ± 0.63 | 24.57 ± 0.12 | 23.59 ± 0.13 | 32.78 ± 0.42 | 14.38 ± 0.09 | 26.38 ± 0.23 | 26.82 ± 0.12 | 38.00 ± 0.19 | 38.69 ± 0.32 |
Fig. 1Stability in expression of 10 reference genes in a ovary and b testis of Puntius sophore as determined by delta Ct method. eef1 and b2mg were found to be the most suitable reference genes in ovary and testis, respectively
Fig. 2geNorm stability values of the 10 reference genes in a ovary and b testis of Puntius sophore. In ovary, eef1 and tubulin were the most stable genes whereas in testis b2mg and tbp were the most suitable reference genes. geNorm stability values (M) for each genes was calculated as the average pairwise variation for that gene with all other tested reference genes using the genorm software and genes were ranked in the increasing order of stability values
Fig. 3Normfinder stability values of the 10 reference genes in a ovary and b testis of Puntius sophore. In ovary, eef1 was the most stable gene whereas in testis b2mg and tbp were the most suitable reference genes as determined by the Normfinder algorithm. Normfinder stability values were calculated by combining the inter and intra group variations determined using the excel-Normfinder add-in. The genes were then ranked in the increasing order of stability values
Descriptive statistics and expression level of reference genes in (a) ovary and (b) testis as obtained by BestKeeper
| a. Ovary | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| n | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 |
| geo Mean [CP] | 13.62 | 20.75 | 35.1 | 13.79 | 16.78 | 33.92 | 21.7 | 20.03 | 20.45 | 18.91 |
| AR Mean [CP] | 13.73 | 21.08 | 35.2 | 14.11 | 16.79 | 33.94 | 21.7 | 20.89 | 20.45 | 18.95 |
| min [Cq] | 11.09 | 16.14 | 31.34 | 10.09 | 16.12 | 32.89 | 21.08 | 14.55 | 20.28 | 17.14 |
| max [Cq] | 15.88 | 25.52 | 37.67 | 16.67 | 17.49 | 35.61 | 22.51 | 29.42 | 20.68 | 20.18 |
| Std. dev [+/− Cq] | 1.58 | 3.09 | 2.46 | 2.66 | 0.42 | 0.98 | 0.51 | 5.62 | 0.15 | 1.14 |
| CV [% Cq] | 11.5 | 14.68 | 6.99 | 18.86 | 2.49 | 2.9 | 2.33 | 26.89 | 0.75 | 6.03 |
| b. Testis | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| n | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 |
| geo Mean [Cq] | 19.83 | 18.7 | 33.08 | 13.49 | 25.43 | 27.6 | 25.76 | 33.88 | 22.53 | 37.59 |
| AR Mean [Cq] | 20.19 | 18.99 | 33.21 | 13.76 | 25.65 | 27.61 | 25.76 | 34.38 | 22.58 | 37.61 |
| min [Cq] | 15.2 | 15.32 | 30.17 | 10.09 | 17.39 | 26.71 | 24.69 | 26.26 | 20.12 | 35.12 |
| max [Cq] | 24.94 | 24 | 53.47 | 16.86 | 27.65 | 28.98 | 27.32 | 38.94 | 24.01 | 39.43 |
| Std. dev [+/− Cq] | 3.18 | 3.06 | 2.18 | 2.34 | 1.96 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 5.25 | 1.39 | 1.33 |
| CV [% Cq] | 15.74 | 16.14 | 6.55 | 16.98 | 7.64 | 2.53 | 1.56 | 15.27 | 6.14 | 3.53 |
Ranking of different candidate reference genes as determined by 4 different algorithms delta CT. BestKepper, NormFinder, geNorm
| a. Ovary | ||||||||||
| Ranking Order (Better--Good--Average) | ||||||||||
| Method | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Delta CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BestKeeper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Normfinder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| geNorm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Recommended comprehensive ranking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b. Testis | ||||||||||
| Ranking Order (Better--Good--Average) | ||||||||||
| Method | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Delta CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BestKeeper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Normfinder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| genorm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Recommended comprehensive ranking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Candidate genes, primer pairs and different q-PCR parameters
| Gene symbol | Primer Forward | Primer Reverse | Amplicon Size | Tm | Fish species | Accession no. | PCR Efficiency (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GGTAGACACACGCTGATCCA | CATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGGT | 96 | 60 |
| KC800799 | 99.1 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| GCCTTCCTTCCTTGGTATGG | GTGTTGGCGTACAGGTCCTT | 89 | 59 |
| KC967219 | 98.50 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| GCCTTCACCCCAGAGAAAGG | GCGGTTGGGATTTACATGTTG | 103 | 55 |
| BC062841 | 99.97 | McCurley and Callard 2008 [ |
|
| CCTGCTGGGAACTGTATTG | TCAATGAGTTCCTTGCCAAT | 89 | 54 |
| KC710731 | 97.64 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| CTTCTCAGGCTGACTGTGC | CCGCTAGCATTACCCTCC | 109 | 56 |
| AY422992 | 99.86 | McCurley and Callard 2008 [ |
|
| ATCAAGGAAGCGGTGAAGAAGG | CGAAGATGGAGGAGTGGGTGTC | 99 | 60 |
| KF044311 | 95.21 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| GTCCCGAAAGGCTCCACTC | CCTCCGCTTTCCTCTC | 112 | 62 |
| BMI82602 | 98.65 | McCurley and Callard 2008 [ |
|
| ATGAACACCAACCCTTCCCG | GGTGGAGGGATGCCATCAAA | 95 | 59 |
| KC915026 | 96.88 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| CTTACCCACCAGCAGTTTAGCAG | CCTTGGCACCTGTGAGTACGATTTG | 126 | 57 |
| KF736933 | 95.37 | Purohit et al. 2015 [ |
|
| GGCCGCAAAGATGCAGAT | CTGGGCTCGACCTCAAGAGT | 69 | 58 |
| EX735613 | 99.78 | Olsvik et al. 2008 [ |