Literature DB >> 28810687

The Characterization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Northeastern US Trucking Terminals.

Erica D Walker1, Jaime E Hart1,2, Eric Garshick2,3, Jennifer M Cavallari4, Mary E Davis5, Thomas J Smith1, Francine Laden1,2,6.   

Abstract

In recent years, significant attention has been given to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exposures given their mutagenic and carcinogenic properties. However, levels of exposure and the key determinants of exposure are not well defined for the trucking industry. We measured ultrafine particle characteristics at 10 trucking terminals of varying operating size and location in the Northeast region of the United States using particle concentration counter and a surface area analyzer. Multivariate mixed-effects linear regression models were used to assess determinants of the concentration of total bound PAHs (tPAH), the total aerosol active surface area (AS), and the ratio tPAH/AS overall and individually within docks, trucking cabs, and administrative offices. Associations between PAH measures with integrated measures of elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and particulate matter (PM)2.5 were assessed by Spearman rank correlation. In adjusted models, tPAH, AS, and tPAH/AS average concentrations (95% confidence interval) were significantly higher in truck cabs compared to office locations (1.26 (ng m-3) (1.18, 1.35); 0.99 (mm2 mm-3) (0.91, 1.08); 0.26 (ng mm-2) (0.18, 0.33), respectively). In the loading dock, AS concentrations were significantly higher than in the office (0.67 (0.61, 0.71), while the tPAH/AS was not (-0.63 (-0.67, -0.58). In each location, average tPAH concentrations were moderately but significantly correlated with EC (r = 0.47-0.63) and with tPAH/AS (r = 0.34-0.40) in the truck cabs and loading docks. In conclusion, key predictors of tPAH, AS, and tPAH/AS within the trucking industry are work location (in particular truck cabs and terminal docks) and terminal characteristics (size). The association of tPAH and tPAH/AS with EC concentrations in dockworkers and pick-up and delivery drivers is consistent with occupational exposure attributable to vehicle exhaust. Therefore, measurement of tPAH, AS, and tPAH/AS to characterize ultrafine particles and bound PAH concentrations provide additional information regarding exposures in the trucking industry not captured by integrated measures by EC, OC, and PM2.5.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecochem; PAHs; trucking industry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28810687      PMCID: PMC6059115          DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  15 in total

1.  Overview of particulate exposures in the US trucking industry.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Mary E Davis; Paul Reaser; Jonathan Natkin; Jaime E Hart; Francine Laden; Allan Heff; Eric Garshick
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-06-01

2.  Spatial and temporal variability of incidental nanoparticles in indoor workplaces: impact on the characterization of point source exposures.

Authors:  Jianjun Niu; Pat E Rasmussen; Robert Magee; Gregory Nilsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.238

3.  Emissions of EC, OC, and PAHs from cottonseed oil biodiesel in a heavy-duty diesel engine.

Authors:  Wei W Song; Ke B He; Jian X Wang; Xin T Wang; Xiao Y Shi; Chao Yu; Wen M Chen; Liang Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  The Diesel Exhaust in Miners study: a cohort mortality study with emphasis on lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael D Attfield; Patricia L Schleiff; Jay H Lubin; Aaron Blair; Patricia A Stewart; Roel Vermeulen; Joseph B Coble; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Models for predicting the ratio of particulate pollutant concentrations inside vehicles to roadways.

Authors:  N Hudda; S A Fruin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Exposure to traffic pollution, acute inflammation and autonomic response in a panel of car commuters.

Authors:  Jeremy A Sarnat; Rachel Golan; Roby Greenwald; Amit U Raysoni; Priya Kewada; Andrea Winquist; Stefanie E Sarnat; W Dana Flanders; Maria C Mirabelli; Jennifer E Zora; Michael H Bergin; Fuyuen Yip
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Adopting Clean Fuels and Technologies on School Buses. Pollution and Health Impacts in Children.

Authors:  Sara D Adar; Jennifer D'Souza; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman; Teal S Hallstrand; Mark E Davey; James R Sullivan; Jordan Jahnke; Jane Koenig; Timothy V Larson; L J Sally Liu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and lung cancer risk: a multicenter study in Europe.

Authors:  Ann C Olsson; Joelle Fevotte; Tony Fletcher; Adrian Cassidy; Andrea 't Mannetje; David Zaridze; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Peter Rudnai; Jolanta Lissowska; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Vehicle traffic as a source of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in the Mexico City metropolitan area.

Authors:  Linsey C Marr; Lisa A Grogan; Henry Wöhrnschimmel; Luisa T Molina; Mario J Molina; Thomas J Smith; Eric Garshick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Traffic-related exposures and biomarkers of systemic inflammation, endothelial activation and oxidative stress: a panel study in the US trucking industry.

Authors:  Andreas M Neophytou; Jaime E Hart; Jennifer M Cavallari; Thomas J Smith; Douglas W Dockery; Brent A Coull; Eric Garshick; Francine Laden
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.