Literature DB >> 28810636

Necessity of heparin for maintaining peripheral venous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tao You1, Jianliang Jiang1, Jianchang Chen1, Weiting Xu1, Li Xiang1, Yang Jiao1.   

Abstract

Heparin has typically been used as a flushing or infusion solution for vascular lines in daily practice. However, several clinical trials have yielded controversial results about the benefits of heparin in maintaining peripheral venous catheters. The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of heparin on the patency profiles and complications in peripheral intravenous catheters. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to February 2016 for randomized controlled trials comparing heparin with placebo in maintaining peripheral intravenous catheters. Additional studies were retrieved from the reference lists of identified articles. In total 32 eligible studies were included, from which the pooled standard mean difference (SMD), relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The use of heparin as a continuous infusion significantly prolonged the duration of patency (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.48-1.32; P<0.001), reduced rates of infusion failure (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92; P<0.001) and occlusion (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98; P<0.05) in a peripheral intravenous catheter. However, there were no significant changes in the duration of patency and infusion failure when heparin was used intermittently as a flushing solution, although a significantly decreased risk of occlusion was observed in this setting (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98; P<0.05). Furthermore, the risk of phlebitis was significantly decreased by both continuous infusion (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; P<0.01) and intermittent flushing (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; P<0.01) of heparin in peripheral venous catheters. In conclusion, the use of heparin as continuous infusion in peripheral intravenous catheters improved the duration of patency, reduced infusion failure and phlebitis, whereas heparin as intermittent flushing showed more benefits in ameliorating phlebitis rather than in patency profiles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heparin; patency; peripheral intravenous catheters

Year:  2017        PMID: 28810636      PMCID: PMC5526172          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  47 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of effects of heparin flush and saline flush: quality and cost implications.

Authors:  C J Goode; M Titler; B Rakel; D S Ones; C Kleiber; S Small; P K Triolo
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  A randomized trial of heparin and saline for maintaining intravenous locks in neonates.

Authors:  J Heilskov; C Kleiber; K Johnson; J Miller
Journal:  J Soc Pediatr Nurs       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Low-dose heparin use and the patency of peripheral IV catheters in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Ben Vandermeer; Dirk Bassler; Nadia Mansoor
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Heparin is not required for peripheral intravenous locks in neonates.

Authors:  K Brown; J S Tay-Uyboco; D D McMillan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Risk of heparin lock-related bleeding when using indwelling venous catheter in haemodialysis.

Authors:  H Karaaslan; P Peyronnet; D Benevent; C Lagarde; M Rince; C Leroux-Robert
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  0.9% sodium chloride injection with and without heparin for maintaining peripheral indwelling intermittent-infusion devices in infants.

Authors:  T J Nelson; S M Graves
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Heparin for prolonging peripheral intravenous catheter use in neonates: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Upadhyay; K K Verma; P Lal; D Chawla; V Sreenivas
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Heparin sodium versus 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency of indwelling intermittent infusion devices.

Authors:  R A Hamilton; J M Plis; C Clay; L Sylvan
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1988-06

9.  Heparin versus normal saline as a peripheral line flush in maintenance of intermittent intravenous lines in obstetric patients.

Authors:  B A Meyer; C J Little; J A Thorp; G R Cohen; J D Yeast
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The effects of heparin versus normal saline for maintenance of peripheral intravenous locks in pregnant women.

Authors:  Kathryn M Niesen; Denise Y Harris; Linda S Parkin; Lynn T Henn
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Heparin flush vs. normal saline flush to maintain the patency of central venous catheter among adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suresh K Sharma; Shiv K Mudgal; Rakhi Gaur; Rakesh Sharma; Maneesh Sharma; Kalpana Thakur
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-09-30

2.  The Efficacy of Normal Saline (N/S 0.9%) Versus Heparin Solution in Maintaining Patency of Peripheral Venous Catheter and Avoiding Complications: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Sotnikova; Georgia Fasoi; Flora Efstathiou; Evridiki Kaba; Maria Bourazani; Martha Kelesi
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2020-03

3.  Randomized clinical trial analyzing maintenance of peripheral venous catheters in an internal medicine unit: Heparin vs. saline.

Authors:  María Jesús Pérez-Granda; Emilio Bouza; Blanca Pinilla; Raquel Cruces; Ariana González; Jesús Millán; María Guembe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.