Literature DB >> 28810586

Worldwide research productivity in fracture surgery: A 10-year survey of publication activity.

Jianzhong Sun1, Ren Ding1, Tai Ma1, Xiaobing Shi1, Chaolu Bao1, Huapeng Guan2.   

Abstract

Worldwide research contributions have allowed the field of fracture surgery to progress. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have documented the main characteristics of publications from different countries. The present study aimed to determine the quantity and quality of worldwide research in fracture surgery. The Web of Science database was searched to identify fracture articles published between 2005 and 2014. The contributions of countries were evaluated based on paper and citation numbers, and the research output of each country was adjusted according to population size. A total of 19,423 papers on the topic of fracture surgery were identified worldwide, and the total number of publications from 2005 to 2014 had significantly increased by 1.82-fold (P<0.001). The majority of papers (86.64%) were published by high-income countries (gross national income per capita ≥$12,736), 13.25% by middle-income countries ($1,046-12,735) and 0.11% by low-income countries (≤$1,045). The United States contributed the highest number of publications (33.34%), followed by the United Kingdom (9.03%), Germany (8.42%), China (5.58%) and Japan (4.18%). Furthermore, the United States ranked first according to total citations (72,640). Articles from Sweden achieved the highest average citations per paper (15.63), followed by Australia (12.84) and Canada (12.44). When the number of publications were adjusted for population size, Switzerland was the first (56.39), followed by Austria (35.43) and the Netherlands (30.68). In conclusion, the number of publications in fracture surgery increased from 2005 to 2014, and the majority of fracture papers were published by high-income countries, while few papers were published by low-income countries. The United States was the most prolific country, but based on population size, a number of smaller countries in Europe may be relatively more prolific.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bibliometric analysis; fracture surgery; publication; research productivity; worldwide

Year:  2017        PMID: 28810586      PMCID: PMC5525650          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  12 in total

1.  The scientific impact of nations.

Authors:  David A King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Yuan Jiang; Mao Zhang
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Worldwide productivity in the hand and wrist literature: A bibliometric analysis of four highly cited subspecialty journals.

Authors:  Xiaolong Mei; Xuwei Zhu; Tao Zhang; Zhiwei Jia; Chunyou Wan
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Worldwide research productivity in the field of endocrinology and metabolism--a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Xiyan Zhao; Ru Ye; Linhua Zhao; Yiqun Lin; Wenjing Huang; Xinhui He; Fengmei Lian; Xiaolin Tong
Journal:  Endokrynol Pol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.582

5.  Worldwide Research Productivity in the Field of Arthroscopy: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Zhimin Liang; Xuyao Luo; Feng Gong; Hongwei Bao; Haiping Qian; Zhiwei Jia; Guo Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 7.  What's new in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures?

Authors:  Zinon T Kokkalis; Ilias D Iliopoulos; Constantinos Pantazis; Elias Panagiotopoulos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 8.  Minimally invasive internal fixation of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  G Piétu; M Ehlinger
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  The 10/90 divide in mental health research: trends over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Shekhar Saxena; Guillermo Paraje; Pratap Sharan; Ghassan Karam; Ritu Sadana
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009-2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals.

Authors:  Xuyao Luo; Zhimin Liang; Feng Gong; Hongwei Bao; Li Huang; Zhiwei Jia
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

1.  Orthopaedic research in low-income countries: A bibliometric analysis of the current literature.

Authors:  Simon Matthew Graham; Ciaran Brennan; Maritz Laubscher; Sithombo Maqungo; David G Lalloo; Daniel C Perry; Nyengo Mkandawire; William J Harrison
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2019-11-26

2.  Thematic research clusters in very old populations (≥ 80 years): a bibliometric approach.

Authors:  Gregorio Gonzalez-Alcaide; Sergio Palacios-Fernandez; Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 3.  Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Siddarth Daniels David; Nobhojit Roy; Harris Solomon; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg; Martin Gerdin Wärnberg
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-08-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.