OBJECTIVES: The US opioid medication epidemic has resulted in serious health consequences for patients. Formulary management tools adopted by payers, specifically prior authorization (PA) policies, may lower the rates of opioid medication abuse and overdose. We compared rates of opioid abuse and overdose among enrollees in plans that varied in their use of PA from "High PA" (ie, required PA for 17 to 74 opioids), with "Low PA" (ie, required PA for 1 opioid), and "No PA" policies for opioid medications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients initiating opioid treatment in Pennsylvania Medicaid from 2010 to 2012. METHODS: Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations were employed to assess the relationships between the presence of PA policies and opioid medication abuse and overdose, as measured in Medicaid claims data, adjusting for demographics, comorbid health conditions, benzodiazepine/muscle relaxant use, and emergency department use. RESULTS: The study cohort included 297,634 enrollees with a total of 382,828 opioid treatment episodes. Compared with plans with No PA, enrollees in High PA (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.93; P <.001) and Low PA plans (ARR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00; P = .04) had lower rates of abuse. Enrollees in the Low PA plan had a lower rate of overdose than those within plans with No PA (ARR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = .02). High PA plan enrollees were also less likely than No PA enrollees to experience an overdose, but this association was not statistically significant (ARR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.02; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Enrollees within Medicaid plans that utilize PA policies appear to have lower rates of abuse and overdose following initiation of opioid medication treatment.
OBJECTIVES: The US opioid medication epidemic has resulted in serious health consequences for patients. Formulary management tools adopted by payers, specifically prior authorization (PA) policies, may lower the rates of opioid medication abuse and overdose. We compared rates of opioid abuse and overdose among enrollees in plans that varied in their use of PA from "High PA" (ie, required PA for 17 to 74 opioids), with "Low PA" (ie, required PA for 1 opioid), and "No PA" policies for opioid medications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients initiating opioid treatment in Pennsylvania Medicaid from 2010 to 2012. METHODS: Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations were employed to assess the relationships between the presence of PA policies and opioid medication abuse and overdose, as measured in Medicaid claims data, adjusting for demographics, comorbid health conditions, benzodiazepine/muscle relaxant use, and emergency department use. RESULTS: The study cohort included 297,634 enrollees with a total of 382,828 opioid treatment episodes. Compared with plans with No PA, enrollees in High PA (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.93; P <.001) and Low PA plans (ARR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00; P = .04) had lower rates of abuse. Enrollees in the Low PA plan had a lower rate of overdose than those within plans with No PA (ARR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = .02). High PA plan enrollees were also less likely than No PA enrollees to experience an overdose, but this association was not statistically significant (ARR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.02; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Enrollees within Medicaid plans that utilize PA policies appear to have lower rates of abuse and overdose following initiation of opioid medication treatment.
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Alyce S Adams; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; Yuting Zhang; Carl Salzman; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Mark J Edlund; Bradley C Martin; Ming-Yu Fan; Jennifer Brennan Braden; Andrea Devries; Mark D Sullivan Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Mark D Sullivan; Mark J Edlund; Ming-Yu Fan; Andrea DeVries; Jennifer Brennan Braden; Bradley C Martin Journal: Pain Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Nancy E Morden; Judy T Zerzan; Tessa C Rue; Patrick J Heagerty; Elizabeth E Roughead; Stephen B Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Sean D Sullivan Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mark D Sullivan; Mark J Edlund; Ming-Yu Fan; Andrea DeVries; Jennifer Brennan Braden; Bradley C Martin Journal: Pain Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Martin S Andersen; Vincent Lorenz; Anurag Pant; Jeremy W Bray; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Shailina Keshwani; Michael Maguire; Amie Goodin; Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Debbie L Wilson; Juan M Hincapie-Castillo Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Megan S Schuler; Sara E Heins; Rosanna Smart; Beth Ann Griffin; David Powell; Elizabeth A Stuart; Bryce Pardo; Sierra Smucker; Stephen W Patrick; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Bradley D Stein Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Daniel M Hartung; Jonah Geddes; Sara E Hallvik; P Todd Korthuis; Luke Middleton; Gillian Leichtling; Christi Hildebran; Hyunjee Kim Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 2.655