Literature DB >> 28809390

Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients of different ages: a retrospective study.

R J Zhang1, C L Shen1, J X Zhang1, X J Zhang2, F L Dong1, H Tao1, P W Song1, P Ge1, P Xu1, H Q Zhang1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart audit.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the clinical features and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) among different age groups.
SETTING: The first Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China.
METHODS: A total of 460 patients with CSM who were surgically treated over the period of 1995-2009 were investigated. Considering the peak age (40-60 years old) for the onset of symptoms, we divided the patients into three groups by age: young (<40), middle-aged (40-60), and old (>60). The differences in symptoms, symptom durations, involved levels, surgical approaches and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: The number of symptoms and involved levels, symptom duration and posterior approach significantly increased with increasing age, whereas preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association score decreased among the three groups. Spinal cord function improved after surgery in all groups. The highest degree of recovery occurred during the first 6 months after surgery, especially within the first week, and then reached a plateau. After 6 months, however, recovery continuously improved, stabilized and declined in the young, middle-aged, old groups, respectively. The recovery rate was not significantly different at an immediate period (1 week) after operation among the three groups, but was significantly different at later periods (3 or more months postoperatively). Three groups showed no difference in postoperative complication rates.
CONCLUSION: The severity of CSM increased with increasing age. Age was inversely correlated with recovery, and recovery decreased as age increased. Six months post operation was the prime time for the recovery of spinal cord function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28809390     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2017.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

Review 1.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Justin Gibson; Aria Nouri; Bryan Krueger; Nikita Lakomkin; Rani Nasser; David Gimbel; Joseph Cheng
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davies; Oliver Mowforth; Iwan Sadler; Bizhan Aarabi; Brian Kwon; Shekar Kurpad; James S Harrop; Jefferson R Wilson; Robert Grossman; Michael G Fehlings; Mark Kotter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Medial Pedicle Pivot Point Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Morphometric Measurements for Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Novel Technique and Case Series.

Authors:  Ji-Won Kwon; Edward O Arreza; Anthony A Suguitan; Soo-Bin Lee; Sahyun Sung; Yung Park; Joong-Won Ha; Tae Hyung Kim; Seong-Hwan Moon; Byung Ho Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.