Literature DB >> 28808854

Assessing landscape and contaminant point-sources as spatial determinants of water quality in the Vermilion River System, Ontario, Canada.

Carrie Strangway1, Michelle F Bowman1,2, Andrea E Kirkwood3.   

Abstract

The Vermilion River and major tributaries (VRMT) are located in the Vermilion watershed (4272 km2) in north-central Ontario, Canada. This watershed not only is dominated by natural land-cover but also has a legacy of mining and other development activities. The VRMT receive various point (e.g., sewage effluent) and non-point (e.g., mining activity runoff) inputs, in addition to flow regulation features. Further development in the Vermilion watershed has been proposed, raising concerns about cumulative impacts to ecosystem health in the VRMT. Due to the lack of historical assessments on riverine-health in the VRMT, a comprehensive suite of water quality parameters was collected monthly at 28 sites during the ice-free period of 2013 and 2014. Canadian water quality guidelines and objectives were not met by an assortment of water quality parameters, including nutrients and metals. This demonstrates that the VRMT is an impacted system with several pollution hotspots, particularly downstream of wastewater treatment facilities. Water quality throughout the river system appeared to be influenced by three distinct land-cover categories: forest, barren, and agriculture. Three spatial pathway models (geographical, topographical, and river network) were employed to assess the complex interactions between spatial pathways, stressors, and water quality condition. Topographical landscape analyses were performed at five different scales, where the strongest relationships between water quality and land-use occurred at the catchment scale. Sites on the main stem of Junction Creek, a tributary impacted by industrial and urban development, had above average concentrations for the majority of water quality parameters measured, including metals and nitrogen. The river network pathway (i.e., asymmetric eigenvector map (AEM)) and topographical feature (i.e., catchment land-use) models explained most of the variation in water quality (62.2%), indicating that they may be useful tools in assessing the spatial determinants of water quality decline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catchments; Effluent; Emissions; Land-use; River networks; Spatial pathways; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808854     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9933-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  12 in total

1.  Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality.

Authors:  L Sliva; D D Williams
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Three decades of atmospheric metal deposition in Norway as evident from analysis of moss samples.

Authors:  Eiliv Steinnes; Torunn Berg; Hilde Thelle Uggerud
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Adaptation and evaluation of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) for use as an effective tool to characterize drinking source water quality.

Authors:  Tim Hurley; Rehan Sadiq; Asit Mazumder
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Using spatially explicit indicators to investigate watershed characteristics and stream temperature relationships.

Authors:  Zbigniew J Grabowski; Eric Watson; Heejun Chang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Forward selection of explanatory variables.

Authors:  F Guillaume Blanchet; Pierre Legendre; Daniel Borcard
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Saturation of ecosystems with toxic metals in Sudbury basin, Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  J O Nriagu; H K Wong; G Lawson; P Daniel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Modelling the effect of directional spatial ecological processes at different scales.

Authors:  F Guillaume Blanchet; Pierre Legendre; Roxane Maranger; Dominique Monti; Pierre Pepin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Examining the effects of metal mining mixtures on fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) using field-based multi-trophic artificial streams.

Authors:  Lisa D Rozon-Ramilo; Monique G Dubé; Carrie J Rickwood; Som Niyogi
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.291

10.  Comparative analysis of regional water quality in Canada using the Water Quality Index.

Authors:  Simone de Rosemond; Dennis C Duro; Monique Dubé
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  1 in total

1.  A novel approach for assessing watershed susceptibility using weighted overlay and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology: a case study in Eagle Creek Watershed, USA.

Authors:  Fadhil K Jabbar; Katherine Grote; Robert E Tucker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.