Literature DB >> 28808670

Utilization and predictors of expectant management among elderly men with low-and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer in U.S. urological practice.

Huei-Ting Tsai1, George Philips2, Kathryn L Taylor1, Keith Kowalczyk3, Kuo Huai-Ching1, Arnold L Potosky1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Expectant management (EM) reduces overtreatment in low-risk but not intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). We assessed the use and predictors of EM to understand its uptake in U.S. practice.
METHODS: Using the U.S. SEER-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of men 66 years and older diagnosed with low-risk (N=25,506) or intermediate-risk (N=25,597) localized PCa between 2004 - 2011 and followed through December 31, 2012. We defined EM as no definitive therapy (DT) and at least one prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test or re-biopsy 4 - 12 months post diagnosis; or receiving DT after PSA testing or re-biopsy 7 - 12 months after diagnosis. We performed separate analyses for low-risk and intermediate-risk groups using multiple logistic regressions.
RESULTS: For men diagnosed with PCa in 2004-2011, EM increased from 22% to 43% in the low-risk group and from 15% to 18% in the intermediate-risk group. In the low-risk group, EM increased with patients' age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.26 for 71-75 years; 2.21 for 76-80 years; 6.33 for older then 80, p<0.0001, compared to 66-70 years). EM uptake was higher among men with comorbidities (aOR=1.29), and residing in the Pacific region (aOR=0.56, compared to the East Coast).
CONCLUSIONS: In U.S. practice, the utilization of EM steadily increased in low-risk PCa and remained low in the intermediate-risk group over time. While patients with advanced age or comorbidities were more likely to receive EM, its use varied substantially by geographic region. Our findings bring attention to the presence of multiple barriers for EM implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostatic neoplasms; utilization

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808670      PMCID: PMC5553913          DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Pract        ISSN: 2352-0779


  24 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Who bears the greatest burden of aggressive treatment of indolent prostate cancer?

Authors:  Brandon A Mahal; Matthew R Cooperberg; Ayal A Aizer; David R Ziehr; Andrew S Hyatt; Toni K Choueiri; Jim C Hu; Christopher J Sweeney; Clair J Beard; Anthony V D'Amico; Neil E Martin; Peter F Orio; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Karen E Hoffman; Jiangong Niu; Yu Shen; Jing Jiang; John W Davis; Jeri Kim; Deborah A Kuban; George H Perkins; Jay B Shah; Grace L Smith; Robert J Volk; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men Aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Grace L Lu-Yao; Peter C Albertsen; Dirk F Moore; Yong Lin; Robert S DiPaola; Siu-Long Yao
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: selection of patients and predictors of progression.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2008-02-19

7.  NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; John M Barry; Wylie Burke; Nananda F Col; Phaedra S Corso; Everett Dodson; M Elizabeth Hammond; Barry A Kogan; Charles F Lynch; Lee Newcomer; Eric J Seifter; Janet A Tooze; Kasisomayajula Vish Viswanath; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements       Date:  2011 Dec 5-7

8.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer: a final report from three decades of follow-up.

Authors:  Marcin Popiolek; Jennifer R Rider; Ove Andrén; Sven-Olof Andersson; Lars Holmberg; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Novel tools to improve patient selection and monitoring on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Hashim U Ahmed; Chris H Bangma; Matthew R Cooperberg; Arnauld Villers; Christopher C Parker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  Decision Support with the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Fangxin Hong; Traci M Blonquist; Barbara Halpenny; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master; Martin G Sanda; Peter Chang; Gary W Chien; Randy A Jones; Tracey L Krupski; Seth Wolpin; Leslie Wilson; Julia H Hayes; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mitchell Sokoloff; Prabhakara Somayaji
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Hyungwoo Ahn; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Gheeyoung Choe; Sangchul Lee; Hakmin Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.