Literature DB >> 28808583

Successful spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic below-level spinal cord injury pain following complete paraplegia: a case report.

Tim A Reck1, Gunther Landmann1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain is common in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and often difficult to treat. We report a case where epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) below the level of injury has been successfully applied in a patient with a complete spinal cord lesion. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old female presented with neuropathic below-level SCI pain of both lower legs and feet due to complete SCI below T5. Time and pain duration since injury was 2 years. Pain intensity was reported on numeric rating scale with an average of 7/10 (0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning the worst imaginable pain), but also with about 8-10 pain attacks during the day with an intensity of 9/10, which lasted between some minutes and half an hour. SCS was applied below the level of injury at-level T11-L1. After a successful 2 weeks testing period the pulse generator has been implanted permanently with a burst-stimulation pattern. The average pain was reduced to a bearable intensity of 4/10, in addition attacks could be reduced both in frequency and in intensity. This effects lasted for at least three months of follow-up. DISCUSSION: Even in case of complete SCI, SCS might be effective. Mechanisms of pain relief remain unclear. A modulation of suggested residual spinothalamic tract function may play a role. Further investigation has to be carried out to support this theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Pain management

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808583      PMCID: PMC5550928          DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2017.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN: 2058-6124


  33 in total

1.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011.

Authors:  Stephen Burns; Fin Biering-Sørensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; Steven Kirshblum; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt Read; William Waring
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

2.  Sensory function in spinal cord injury patients with and without central pain.

Authors:  N B Finnerup; I L Johannesen; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; F W Bach; T S Jensen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Complex regional pain syndrome: manifestations and the role of neurostimulation in its management.

Authors:  Michael Stanton-Hicks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Characterization of chronic pain and somatosensory function in spinal cord injury subjects.

Authors:  R Defrin; A Ohry; N Blumen; G Urca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Spinal cord stimulation for FBSS and CRPS: A review of 80 cases with on-table trial of stimulation.

Authors:  Hari Gopal; Joseph Fitzgerald; Connail McCrory
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.398

6.  Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of paraplegic pain.

Authors:  B Cioni; M Meglio; L Pentimalli; M Visocchi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Gary Hunter; Denny Demeria
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: now and in the future.

Authors:  P J Siddall
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.

Authors:  G Barolat; B Ketcik; J He
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  1998-01

10.  The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Nagy Mekhail; David Provenzano; Jason Pope; Elliot Krames; Michael Leong; Robert M Levy; David Abejon; Eric Buchser; Allen Burton; Asokumar Buvanendran; Kenneth Candido; David Caraway; Michael Cousins; Michael DeJongste; Sudhir Diwan; Sam Eldabe; Kliment Gatzinsky; Robert D Foreman; Salim Hayek; Philip Kim; Thomas Kinfe; David Kloth; Krishna Kumar; Syed Rizvi; Shivanand P Lad; Liong Liem; Bengt Linderoth; Sean Mackey; Gladstone McDowell; Porter McRoberts; Lawrence Poree; Joshua Prager; Lou Raso; Richard Rauck; Marc Russo; Brian Simpson; Konstantin Slavin; Peter Staats; Michael Stanton-Hicks; Paul Verrills; Joshua Wellington; Kayode Williams; Richard North
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-08
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Wanru Duan; Eellan Sivanesan; Shuguang Liu; Fei Yang; Zhiyong Chen; Neil C Ford; Xueming Chen; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Relief of Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation in a Patient With Idiopathic Thoracic Transverse Myelitis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Rajiv Reddy; Rupa Prasad; Sepehr Rejai; Kenneth Halter; Jeffrey Chen
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Promotes Motor Functional Recovery by Enhancing Oligodendrocyte Survival and Differentiation and by Protecting Myelin after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Gang Li; Zhong-Kai Fan; Guang-Fei Gu; Zhi-Qiang Jia; Qiang-Qiang Zhang; Jun-Yu Dai; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Real-World Evidence and Outcomes Data.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Rudy Malayil; Terje Kirketeig; Timothy Deer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.