| Literature DB >> 28808560 |
Chelsea J Little1, Marie-Pierre Chapuis2, Laurence Blondin3, Elodie Chapuis4,5, Hélène Jourdan-Pineau5.
Abstract
Tychoparthenogenesis, a form of asexual reproduction in which a small proportion of unfertilized eggs can hatch spontaneously, could be an intermediate evolutionary link in the transition from sexual to parthenogenetic reproduction. The lower fitness of tychoparthenogenetic offspring could be due to either developmental constraints or to inbreeding depression in more homozygous individuals. We tested the hypothesis that in populations where inbreeding depression has been purged, tychoparthenogenesis may be less costly. To assess this hypothesis, we compared the impact of inbreeding and parthenogenetic treatments on eight life-history traits (five measuring inbreeding depression and three measuring inbreeding avoidance) in four laboratory populations of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, with contrasted demographic histories. Overall, we found no clear relationship between the population history (illustrated by the levels of genetic diversity or inbreeding) and inbreeding depression, or between inbreeding depression and parthenogenetic capacity. First, there was a general lack of inbreeding depression in every population, except in two populations for two traits. This pattern could not be explained by the purging of inbreeding load in the studied populations. Second, we observed large differences between populations in their capacity to reproduce through tychoparthenogenesis. Only the oldest laboratory population successfully produced parthenogenetic offspring. However, the level of inbreeding depression did not explain the differences in parthenogenetic success between all studied populations. Differences in development constraints may arise driven by random and selective processes between populations.Entities:
Keywords: Schistocerca gregaria; desert locust; inbreeding depression; parthenogenesis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28808560 PMCID: PMC5551105 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Summary of genetic variability measures of the laboratory populations compared to a reference field population
| Population | Year | NG |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mauritania (field) | 2009 | 0 | 21 | 12.3 | 0.890 | −0.044 |
| France | 2011 | 5 | 22 | 8.4 | 0.840 | 0.068 |
| Belgium | 2009 | >100 | 30 | 3.9 | 0.560 | −0.005 |
| England | 2013 | >100 | 30 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 0.017 |
Year: year when the studied population was sampled and genotyped; NG: number of generations spent in the laboratory at the date of genotyping; N: number of genotyped individuals; A R, mean allelic richness per locus; H E: mean expected heterozygosity; F IS: inbreeding coefficient. Note that except for the English population, genotyping has been performed before this study took place.
Factors significantly influencing maternal and offspring traits
| Trait | Selected parameters |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laying probability | Population | 3 | 30.68 | .000 |
| Treatment | 2 | 23.52 | .000 | |
| Time to first laying | Population | 3 | 124.32 | .000 |
| Egg number | Population | 3 | 9.92 | .000 |
| Treatment | 2 | 2.18 | .116 | |
| Egg pod | 1 | 11.99 | .001 | |
| Population:treatment | 5 | 2.03 | .077 | |
| Hatching rate | Population | 3 | 1.23 | .299 |
| Treatment | 2 | 45.04 | .000 | |
| Population:treatment | 5 | 2.61 | .027 | |
| First day survival | Treatment | 2 | 60.56 | .000 |
| Development time | Population | 2 | 72.3112 | .000 |
| Sex | 1 | 34.9112 | .000 | |
| Extramolting | 1 | 37.9551 | .000 | |
| Population:treatment | 2 | 6.694 | .001 | |
| Femur length | Sex | 1 | 1152.22 | .000 |
| Population | 2 | 77.58 | .000 | |
| Extramolting | 1 | 11.42 | .001 | |
| Population:treatment | 2 | 4.39 | .013 |
For each trait, we reported the degrees of freedom, F values or deviance (for chi‐square tests) and p‐values. Note that for development time and femur length only three populations (Belgium, France and UK) and two treatments (outbreeding and inbreeding) were analyzed, see section 2 for details.
Figure 1Means and standard deviations of measured traits in populations and reproductive treatments. (a) Proportion of females laying eggs, (b) time to first egg laying, (c) number of eggs, (d) hatching rate in one egg pod, (e) offspring survival 24 hr after hatching, (f) larval development time, and (g) adult femur size. Measurements (a) to (e) were made on the four studied populations (Mauritania, France, Belgium, and England) whereas measurements related (f) and (g) could be measured from Belgium, France, and England for the outbred and inbred treatments only. The genetic characteristics and the number of individuals measured in each population are detailed in Table 1, Annexes 1 and 2
Figure 2Larval survival curves of inbred, outbred, and parthenogenetic offspring. Inbred and outbred offspring are from the French, Belgian, and England population whereas the parthenogenetic offspring are from the England population only. Central survival curves are surrounded by 95% confidence intervals