| Literature DB >> 28808253 |
V Lauria1, G Garofalo2, F Fiorentino2, D Massi2, G Milisenda2, S Piraino3,4, T Russo5, M Gristina2.
Abstract
Deep-sea coral assemblages are key components of marine ecosystems that generate habitats for fish and invertebrate communities and act as marine biodiversity hot spots. Because of their life history traits, deep-sea corals are highly vulnerable to human impacts such as fishing. They are an indicator of vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs), therefore their conservation is essential to preserve marine biodiversity. In the Mediterranean Sea deep-sea coral habitats are associated with commercially important crustaceans, consequently their abundance has dramatically declined due to the effects of trawling. Marine spatial planning is required to ensure that the conservation of these habitats is achieved. Species distribution models were used to investigate the distribution of two critically endangered octocorals (Funiculina quadrangularis and Isidella elongata) in the central Mediterranean as a function of environmental and fisheries variables. Results show that both species exhibit species-specific habitat preferences and spatial patterns in response to environmental variables, but the impact of trawling on their distribution differed. In particular F. quadrangularis can overlap with fishing activities, whereas I. elongata occurs exclusively where fishing is low or absent. This study represents the first attempt to identify key areas for the protection of soft and compact mud VMEs in the central Mediterranean Sea.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28808253 PMCID: PMC5556048 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08386-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Information relative to the biology and fisheries of Funiculina quadrangularis and Isidella elongata.
| Species | Description | Anchoring structure | Body flexibility | Habitat type | Fisheries | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| • It is a tall, narrow sea pen, often found in large populations | • A bulb, or peduncle at the bottom of the modified axial polyp that may penetrates into the sediment down to about 50 cm | • It can lie flat under the pressure of wave of approaching gears | • It prefers soft muddy habitat at depths of between 20–2000 m | • This is considered one of the most sensitive sea pen species to fisheries as it is unable to withdraw into the sediment. |
|
| • It is often found in moderately high energy environments characterised by a noticeable bottom current, necessary for procuring adequate food | ||||||
| • It can reach 2 m in height with the lower quarter embedded in the sediment and usually curved in the upper third | ||||||
| • In the northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea is associated with | ||||||
| • It has a calcareous white axis, typically square in section | ||||||
| • Information on its longevity does not exist | ||||||
|
| • This species is a near-endemic deep-water gorgonian also known as bamboo coral | • A lobed, root-like holdfast attached to small stones embedded in the surface sediment | • Not flexible due to its fan body shape | • It prefers compact mud | • In the Mediterranean Sea it is usually associated with the high-value, deep-water red shrimps |
|
| • This species occurs mainly in intermediate and deep waters (200–1500 m depth) on moderately flat bottoms | ||||||
| • It can reach up to 3 m in height forming large single-species stands | ||||||
| • This species characterises a facies of bathyal compact mud substrate on moderately flat bottoms (slope <5%) | ||||||
| • It is a long-lived species (75–126 years) |
Figure 1Location of the study region within the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea). This area corresponds to the Geographic Sub Area (GSA) 16. Trawl stations sampled during the MEDITS Survey (2008–2013) are indicated with an x. This map was created with ArcGIS version 10.3 http://www.esriitalia.it by Valentina Lauria.
Predictors used for habitat modelling.
| Variable | Unit | Resolution | Descriptor | Type of data | Data source | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | m | 0.866 km | Bathymetry | Continuous digital map |
|
|
| Slope | degrees | 0.866 km | Typology of substrata | Derived from bathymetry data | Benthic Terrain Modeller in ArcGIS 10.3 |
|
| Rugosity | No unit | 0.866 km | Derived from bathymetry data | Benthic Terrain Modeller in ArcGIS 10.3 |
| |
| Aspect East/West and North/South | Radians | 0.866 km | Orientation of the substrata | Derived from bathymetry data |
|
|
| Currents | m/s | 6.5 km | Current | Derived from model |
|
|
| Sea bottom temperature | °C | 6.5 km | Temperature | Derived from model |
|
|
| Sea bottom salinity | psu | 6.5 km | Salinity | Derived from model |
|
|
| Fishing pressure | Number of fishing hours/year | 0.866 km | Fishery effort | VMS data | European Vessel Monitoring System |
|
Figure 2The spatial patterns of the environmental variables used to map the habitat models. These include (A) depth (m); (B) slope (degrees) values range from to 0° to 90° with low slope values corresponding to flat terrain and higher values to steeper terrain; (C) rugosity values range from 0 (no terrain variation) to 1 (complete terrain variation); (D) aspect north-south and east-west (E) scaled to 100 (radians); (F) Current north-south (m/s); (G) Current west-east (m/s); (H) sea bottom temperature (°C); (I) sea bottom salinity (PSU); (J) Average distribution of the fishing effort between 2008–2013 in terms of number of fishing hours/year. These maps were created with ArcGIS version 10.3 http://www.esriitalia.it by Valentina Lauria.
Best supported and competing models (using binomial and positive models) for Funiculina quadrangularis.
| Model | Depth | Slope | Rugosity | AspectNS | AspectEW | CurrentNS | CurrentWE | SBT | SBS | Fishing effort | ΔAIC | AICw | Adj-R2 | Dev % | rs | ROC AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 15.6 | 0.29 *** | 0.77 | |||||
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0 | 0.07 | 0.61 | 64.9 | |||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 15.6 | — | — | ||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.13 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 15.5 | — | — | ||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.39 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 15.5 | — | — | |||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.78 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 15.5 | — | — | ||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.89 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 16.2 | — | — | |||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.93 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 15.5 | — | — | ||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.60 | 63.3 | — | — | ||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.25 | 0.03 | 0.59 | 61.9 | — | — | |||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.25 | 0.03 | 0.59 | 62.2 | — | — | ||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.45 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 63.9 | — | — | |
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 1.7 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 61.4 | — | — |
Variables included in model are indicated with the symbol #. Predictors include depth, slope, rugosity, aspectNS, aspectEW, CurrentNS, CurrentWE, sea bottom temperature (SBT), sea bottom salinity (SBS) and fishing effort. ΔAIC: delta AIC (difference in AIC between the best model and current model); AICw: Akaike’s Information Criteria (corrected) weights, values range from 0 to 1, and high values indicate strong support for a given predictor. Models were evaluated by R2-adjusted coefficient and deviance (Dev): percentage of deviance explained. Only for the binomial model the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were calculated. Significance value of the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) (corrected for spatial autocorrelation) for the delta model is given as ***p value < 0.001, **p value < 0.01, *p value < 0.05.
Best supported and competing models (using binomial and positive models) for Isidella elongata.
| Model | Depth | Slope | Rugosity | AspectNS | AspectEW | CurrentNS | CurrentWE | SBT | SBS | Fishing effort | AICw | ΔAIC | Adj-R2 | Dev % | rs | ROC AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.13 | 0 | 0.29 | 35.3 | 0.18 | 0.89 | |||
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.07 | 0 | 0.25 | 29.9 | |||||||||
|
| Binomial | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 34.7 | — | — | ||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 35.0 | — | — | ||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 35.2 | — | — | |||
|
|
| #### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.07 | 1.21 | 0.27 | 34.2 | — | — | |||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.04 | 1.33 | 0.26 | 30.6 | — | — | |||||
|
|
| ##### | ##### | ##### | ##### | 0.03 | 1.55 | 0.23 | 27.6 | — | — |
Variables included in model are indicated with the symbol #. Predictors include depth, slope, rugosity, aspectNS, aspectEW, CurrentNS, CurrentWE, sea bottom temperature (SBT), sea bottom salinity (SBS) and fishing effort. ΔAIC: delta AIC (difference in AIC between the best model and current model); AICw: Akaike’s Information Criteria (corrected) weights, values range from 0 to 1, and high values indicate strong support for a given predictor. Models were evaluated by R2-adjusted coefficient and deviance (Dev): percentage of deviance explained. Only for the binomial model the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were calculated. Significance value of the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) (corrected for spatial autocorrelation) for the delta model is given as ***p value < 0.001, **p value < 0.01, *p value < 0.05.
Relative importance of predictor variables (calculated as the sum AIC weights from models that contain that variable within the 95% confidence interval) for Funiculina quadrangularis and Isidella elongata.
| Species | Model | Depth | Slope | Rugosity | AspectNS | AspectEW | CurrentNS | CurrentWE | SBT | SBS | Fishing effort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Binomial | Importance | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.83 | 0.29 | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| N containing models | 113 | 111 | 43 | 48 | 59 | 64 | 75 | 50 | 81 | 92 | ||
| Positive | Importance | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.94 | |
| N containing models | 121 | 83 | 117 | 78 | 106 | 156 | 72 | 111 | 89 | 115 | ||
|
| Binomial | Importance | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.46 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.15 |
| N containing models | 61 | 24 | 39 | 34 | 31 | 57 | 39 | 61 | 43 | 23 | ||
| Positive | Importance | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.99 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.77 | 0.99 | 0.70 | |
| N containing models | 109 | 109 | 102 | 229 | 97 | 108 | 96 | 140 | 232 | 124 |
Figure 3Partial GAM plots for the best binomial and positive models for Funiculina quadrangularis. Each plot represents the response variable shape, independent of the other variables, in relation to the probability of the species occurrence (A) and abundance (B) in the multivariate model. The ranges of environmental variables are represented on the x-axis and the probability of occurrence of the species is represented on the y-axis (logit scale). The zero value indicates mean model estimates, while the y-axis is a relative scale where the effect of different values of the predictors on the response variable is shown. The degree of smoothing is indicated in the y-axis label. Confidence intervals (95%) around the response curve are shaded in grey.
Figure 4Partial GAM plots for the best binomial and positive models for Isidella elongata. Each plot represents the response variable shape, independent of the other variables, in relation to the probability of the species occurrence (A) and abundance (B) in the multivariate model. The ranges of environmental variables are represented on the x-axis and the probability of occurrence of the species is represented on the y-axis (logit scale). The zero value indicates mean model estimates, while the y-axis is a relative scale where the effect of different values of the predictors on the response variable is shown. The degree of smoothing is indicated in the y-axis label. Confidence intervals (95%) around the response curve are shaded in grey.
Figure 5(A) Funiculina quadrangularis and (B) Isidella elongata in the Strait of Sicily. Predicted population densities from delta model (Nkm−2; top figures) representing preferential habitat, and associated prediction error (down Figures; 0 and 1 correspond to the minimum and maximum possible errors, respectively). These maps were created with ArcGIS version 10.3 http://www.esriitalia.it by Valentina Lauria.