Literature DB >> 28807981

Delineation of the timing of second-line therapy post-autologous stem cell transplant in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Yi L Hwa1, Rahma Warsame1, Morie A Gertz1, Francis K Buadi1, Martha Q Lacy1, Shaji K Kumar1, David Dingli1, Steve R Zeldenrust1, Nelson Leung1,2, Susanne R Hayman1, Prashant Kapoor1, Wilson I Gonsalves1, Taxiarchis V Kourelis1, Stephen Russell1, Ronald S Go1, Miriam A Hobbs1, Amie L Fonder1, S Vincent Rajkumar1,3, Angela Dispenzieri1,3.   

Abstract

Among patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, there is little consensus on when reinstitution of chemotherapy should occur. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the patterns of relapse or progression (R/P) and the timing of reinitiating therapy among 235 patients initially treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) at Mayo Clinic. The median time from ASCT to second-line therapy was 24.3 months. At the time of restarting therapy, median difference of free light chain (dFLC) was 9.9 mg/dL (42% of diagnosis value), 32% had a dFLC <5 mg/dL, and 63% met criteria for organ R/P. The indications for retreatment were (1) clinical suspicion of R/P, 10%; 92) hematologic R/P only, 23%; (3) organ R/P only, 32%; (4) both hematologic and organ R/P, 31%; and (5) suboptimal response to ASCT and second-line therapy as consolidation, 4%. Patients with organ progression at the time of second-line therapy had inferior survival. Although a dFLC of >5 mg/dL at the time of reinstituting therapy was associated with risk, patients relapsing from very good partial response (VGPR) or better had a longer time to develop organ progression after hematologic R/P (24.2 vs 3.2 months, P = .007). These data suggest that the best candidates for clinical trials testing novel plasma cell-directed chemotherapy beyond first line may be those patients who are either relapsing from VGPR or better (dFLC at diagnosis was >5 mg/dL) or having inadequate response to prior therapy. This strategy should allow for hematologic response assessment while avoiding the risk of deleterious organ progression. Implementation of more stringent progression criteria may also be warranted.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28807981     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-783415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  3 in total

1.  When should treatment of AL amyloidosis start at relapse? Early, to prevent organ progression.

Authors:  Giovanni Palladini; Giampaolo Merlini
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-01-22

Review 2.  Delay treatment of AL amyloidosis at relapse until symptomatic: devil is in the details.

Authors:  Vaishali Sanchorawala
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-01-22

3.  Correlation between urine ACR and 24-h proteinuria in a real-world cohort of systemic AL amyloidosis patients.

Authors:  Alissa Visram; Abdullah S Al Saleh; Harsh Parmar; Jennifer S McDonald; John C Lieske; Iuliana Vaxman; Eli Muchtar; Miriam Hobbs; Amie Fonder; Yi L Hwa; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Prashant Kapoor; Suzanne R Hayman; Rahma Warsame; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Mustaqeem Siddiqui; Wilson I Gonsalves; John A Lust; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz; Shaji K Kumar; Nelson Leung
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 11.037

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.