Literature DB >> 28807538

Lactose malabsorption and taste aversion learning.

Joe Arthurs1, Jian-You Lin2, Roberto Ocampo2, Steve Reilly3.   

Abstract

Consumption of foods can be suppressed by two feeding system defense mechanisms: conditioned taste aversion (CTA) or taste avoidance learning (TAL). There is a debate in the literature about which form of intake suppression is caused by various aversive stimuli. For instance, illness-inducing stimuli like lithium chloride are the gold standard for producing CTA and external (or peripheral) painful stimuli, such as footshock, are the traditional model of TAL. The distinction between CTA and TAL, which have identical effects on intake, is based on differential effects on palatability. That is, CTA involves a decrease in both intake and palatability, whereas TAL suppresses intake without influencing palatability. We evaluated whether lactose, which causes gastrointestinal pain in adult rats, produces CTA or TAL. Using lick pattern analysis to simultaneously measure intake and palatability (i.e., lick cluster size and initial lick rate), we found that pairing saccharin with intragastric infusions of lactose suppressed both the intake and palatability of saccharin. These results support the conclusion that gastrointestinal pain produced by lactose malabsorption produces a CTA, not TAL as had previously been suggested. Furthermore, these findings encourage the view that the CTA mechanism is broadly tuned to defend against the ingestion of foods with aversive post-ingestive effects.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned taste aversion; Lactose; Lick pattern analysis; Palatability; Taste avoidance learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28807538      PMCID: PMC5597491          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  52 in total

1.  Effects of anterior basolateral amygdala lesions on taste aversions produced by high and low oral doses of LiCl and lactose in the rat.

Authors:  L C Simbayi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Taste reactivity responses elicited by reinforcing drugs: a dose-response analysis.

Authors:  L A Parker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Introduction: physiological mechanisms in conditioned taste aversions.

Authors:  H J Grill
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Food deprivation- and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis; M C Perez
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

6.  mu-Opioid receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens elevates fatty tastant intake by increasing palatability and suppressing satiety signals.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Jennifer A Heckmann; Sharif A Taha
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Reduced palatability in pain-induced conditioned taste aversions.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-06-13

8.  The painlike effect of gallamine and naloxone differs from sickness induced by lithium chloride.

Authors:  B T Lett
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Orofacial and somatic responses elicited by lithium-, nicotine- and amphetamine-paired sucrose solution.

Authors:  L A Parker; T Carvell
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  Daily memantine treatment blunts hedonic response to sucrose in rats.

Authors:  Adriana Galistu; Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Conditioned taste aversion versus avoidance: A re-examination of the separate processes hypothesis.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Kellie M Hyde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.

Authors:  Paolo S D'Aquila; Adriana Galistu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.