| Literature DB >> 28807016 |
Xi Wu1, Susu Liu1, Jianjun Lyu2, Shuya Zhou1, Yanwei Yang2, Chenfei Wang1, Wenda Gu1, Qin Zuo1, Baowen Li1, Changfa Fan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become an increasingly important technique for gene expression profiling because it can provide insights into complex biological and pathological processes and be used to predict disease or treatment outcomes. Although normalized data are necessary for an accurate estimation of mRNA expression levels, several pieces of evidence suggest that the expression of so-called housekeeping genes is not stable. This study aimed to validate reference genes for the normalization of real-time PCR in an N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced T-cell lymphoma mouse model.Entities:
Keywords: Lymphoma model; Quantitative real-time PCR; Reference genes; p53-deficient mouse
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28807016 PMCID: PMC5557555 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3536-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Gene-specific RT-qPCR assays
| Gene name | Gene symbol | GeneBank No. | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glyceraldehyde3-phosphate dehydrogenase |
| NR_003278.3 | Glycolysis pathway enzyme |
| 18S Ribosomal RNA |
| NM_001198859.1 | Protein Synthesis |
| Beta Actin |
| NM_010368.1 | Cytoskeletal structural protein |
| Beta 2 Microglobulin |
| NM_007475.5 | Beta-chain of major histocompatibility complex |
| Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase |
| NM_013556.2 | Metabolic salvage of purines |
| Ribosomal Protein large P0 |
| NM_009735.3 | Structural constituent of ribosome |
| Beta Glucuronidase |
| NM_001289726.1 | Glycoprotein, degradation of dermatan and keratin sulfates |
| C-terminal Binding Protein 1 |
| NM_007393.5 | Regulate brown adipose tissue differentiation |
Fig. 1Experimental design of analysis. Fifty p53 +/− mice were divided into two groups and administered 37.5 mg/kg MNU or citrate buffer. Five mice from each group were sacrificed immediately and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after intraperitoneal injection. Thymus and spleen were dissected for RNA extraction. The most stable genes were determined in the MNU and control groups (Groups 1 and 2), and in mice grouped according to the time points after MNU administration (Groups A–D)
Fig. 2Features of lymphoma occurrence in p53-deficient heterozygous mice induced by 37.5 mg/kg MNU. a Tumor frequency in mice administered MNU or citrate buffer. b Tumor frequencies in thymus and spleen of mice administered MNU. c Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of lymphoma in thymus. d H&E staining of lymphoma in spleen. e, f. Thymus (e) and spleen (f) lymphoma stained positive for CD3 (T-lymphocyte marker). g, h Thymus (g) and spleen (h) lymphoma stained negative for CD20 (B-lymphocyte marker). i, j Thymus (i) and spleen (j) lymphoma stained negative for CD68 (macrophage marker). Magnification ×200, scale bar = 100 μm
Selected candidate reference genes
| Gene symbol | Primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Size (bp) | Efficiency (%) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| F1 CAGCAACTCCCACTCTTCCAC | 192 | 105 | 0.998 |
|
| F1 GCAATTATTCCCCATGAACG | 237 | 95 | 0.997 |
|
| F1 CCTCCCTGGAGAAGAGCTATG | 132 | 101 | 0.992 |
|
| F1 CTCGGTGACCCTGGTCTTTC | 170 | 99 | 0.998 |
|
| F1 AGTCCCAGCGTCGTGATTAG | 164 | 98 | 0.997 |
|
| F1 CTCTCGCTTTCTGGAGGGTG | 172 | 103 | 0.994 |
|
| F1 TGGGTGTGGTATGAACGGGA | 123 | 98 | 0.999 |
|
| F1 TGCATGGTACAGTGAGCAGG | 162 | 105 | 0.998 |
Fig. 3Range of quantification cycle values of the candidate reference genes. Mean of Ct values for the eight reference genes in thymus (a) and spleen (b) with or without MNU treatment at each time point
Fig. 4Expression stabilities of the eight candidate genes after administration of MNU. a, b Mean expression stability values in thymus from least to most stable are presented on the y- and x-axes using geNorm (a) and NormFinder (b). c, d Mean expression stability values in spleen from least to most stable expression are presented on the y- and x-axes using geNorm (c) and NormFinder (d)
Ranking of the candidate mRNA reference genes according to their stability value using geNorm and NormFinder
| Thymus | Spleen | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Drug | Time | Drug | |||||
| Gene symbol | NormFinder | geNorm | NormFinder | geNorm | NormFinder | geNorm | NormFinder | geNorm |
|
| 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
|
| 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
|
| 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
|
| 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
|
| 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
Fig. 5Expression stabilities of the eight candidate genes during lymphoma development. a, b Mean expression stability values in thymus from least to most stable expression are presented on the y- and x-axes using geNorm (a) and NormFinder (b). c, d Mean expression stability values in spleen from least to most stable expression are presented on the y- and x-axes using geNorm (c) and NormFinder (d)