| Literature DB >> 28806972 |
Chang Yoon Ji1,2, Rong Jin1,2,3, Zhen Xu3, Ho Soo Kim1, Chan-Ju Lee1,2, Le Kang1,2, So-Eun Kim1,2, Hyeong-Un Lee4, Joon Seol Lee4, Chang Ho Kang5, Yong Hun Chi5, Sang Yeol Lee5, Yiping Xie3, Hongmin Li3, Daifu Ma3, Sang-Soo Kwak6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) is suitable for growth on marginal lands due to its abiotic stress tolerance. However, severe environmental conditions including low temperature pose a serious threat to the productivity and expanded cultivation of this crop. In this study, we aimed to develop sweetpotato plants with enhanced tolerance to temperature stress.Entities:
Keywords: Acidic ribosomal P-proteins; Heat stress; Low temperature stress; Protein chaperone; Sweetpotato
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806972 PMCID: PMC5557506 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-017-1087-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Development and molecular characterization of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing AtP3B. a Schematic diagram of the vector construct containing AtP3B under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. b Genomic DNA PCR analysis using the 35Spro::AtP3B primer set. PC, positive control. c qRT-PCR analysis of transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing AtP3B. Three independent transgenic lines (#1, #30, and #32) were selected for further characterization. d Southern blot analysis of OP plants; the integration and gene copy number of the construct in OP plants were confirmed using a 32P–labeled probe designed based on the AtP3B cDNA fragment
Fig. 2Phenotypic and physiological analyses of OP plants under heat stress treatment (45 °C) and after recovery at 25 °C. a Visible damage in the leaves of sweetpotato plants after 12 h heat stress treatment and 24 h recovery. b PSII photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/fm) in the leaves of WT and OP plants after 12 h heat stress treatment and 24 h recovery. c Analysis of electrolyte leakage. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OP plants by ANOVA at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01
Fig. 3Phenotypic and physiological analyses of OP plants under low temperature treatment (4 °C) and after recovery at 25 °C. a Visible damage in the leaves of sweetpotato plants after 48 h cold stress treatment and 24 h recovery. b PSII photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/fm), c Ion leakage in detached leaves treated with 4 °C for 48 h, and d MDA contents in the leaves of WT and OP plants after 48 h cold stress treatment and 24 h recovery. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OP plants by ANOVA at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01
Fig. 4Analysis of H2O2 contents and antioxidant enzyme activity in WT and OP plants under low temperature stress. a H2O2 contents in leaves of WT and OP plants after 48 h low temperature stress treatment and 24 h recovery. b and c Changes in antioxidant enzyme activity in WT and OP plants after 48 h low temperature stress treatment and 24 h recovery. POD activity (b) and CAT activity (c). Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent measurements. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OP plants by ANOVA at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01
Fig. 5Growth-related features of WT and OP plants under field conditions. a Photographs of aerial plant parts and tuberous roots. b Average shoot lengths of plants. c Average yields of aerial plant parts. d Average yields of tuberous roots. Data are means ± SD of three row replicates (40 individual plants were planted per line). Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OP plants by ANOVA at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01
Fig. 6Storage ability of transgenic sweetpotato tuberous roots during low temperature storage. a Photographs of WT and OP tuberous roots stored at 13 °C and 4 °C for 8 weeks. b Analysis of ion leakage and c MDA contents in tuberous roots of WT and OP plants stored in 13 °C and 4 °C for 8 weeks. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OP plants by ANOVA at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01