| Literature DB >> 28806968 |
Md Mizanur Rahman1, Mohammad Nazmul Alam1, Anayt Ulla1, Farzana Akther Sumi1, Nusrat Subhan1, Trisha Khan1, Bishwajit Sikder1, Hemayet Hossain2, Hasan Mahmud Reza1, Md Ashraful Alam3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardamom is a well-known spice in Indian subcontinent, used in culinary and traditional medicine practices since ancient times. The current investigation was untaken to evaluate the potential benefit of cardamom powder supplementation in high carbohydrate high fat (HCHF) diet induced obese rats.Entities:
Keywords: Cardamom; Dyslipidemia; Fibrosis; Glucose intolerance; Inflammation; Obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806968 PMCID: PMC5557534 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0539-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Composition of normal and high carbohydrate high fat diet used in this study (for 100 g)
| Ingredients of | % | Ingredients of HCHF diet | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | 40% | Powdered normal rat feed | 15.5% |
| Wheat bran | 20% | Sugar | 17.5% |
| Rice Polishing | 5.5% | Beef tallow (fat) | 20.0% |
| Fish meal | 10.0% | Condensed milk | 39.5% |
| Oil cake | 6.0% | Vit-B complex | 0.1% |
| Gram | 0.39% | Salt | 0.5% |
| Pulses | 0.39% | Water | 100 ml |
| Milk | 0.38% | ||
| Soybean Oil | 1.5% | ||
| Molasses | 0.095% | ||
| Salt | 0.095% | ||
| Embavit (vitamin) | 0.1% |
Normal chow diet contained as percentage of calories 14% proteins, 57% carbohydrates, 13.5% fat. High Carbohydrate high fat diets contained as percentage of calories 14% proteins, 37% carbohydrates, 48% fat
Fig. 1HPLC chromatogram of ethanol extract of Cardamom Peaks: 1, (−)-epicatechin (ECA); 2, vanillin (VL); 3, p-coumaric acid (PCA); 4, trans-ferulic acid (FA); 5, ellagic acid (EA)
Contents of polyphenolic compounds in the ethanol extract of cardamom (n = 5)
| Polyphenolic compound | Ethanol extract of cardamom | |
|---|---|---|
| Content (mg/100 g of dry extract) | % RSD | |
| ECA | 56.28 | 1.39 |
| VL | 2.17 | 0.05 |
| PCA | 4.06 | 0.08 |
| FA | 14.93 | 0.46 |
| EA | 9.88 | 0.12 |
ECA, (−) epicatechin; VL, vanillin; PCA, p-coumaric acid; FA, Ferulic acid; EA, Ellagic acid
Fig. 2Effect of Cardamom Powder supplementation on body weight (a), food (b) and water (c) intake in high fat diet induced obese rats. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7
Effects of HCHF diet on body weight, food and water intake and organ weight
| Parameters | Control | Control + Cardamom | HCHF | HCHFF+ Cardamom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 194.25 ± 1.68 | 197.23 ± 2.95 | 195.18 ± 1.31 | 195.55 ± 3.39 |
| Final body weight (g) | 220.68 ± 7.14 | 230.83 ± 3.65 | 266.40±4.33 | 258.15 ± 1.58 |
| Food intake /d (g) | 14.60 ± 0.70 | 15.92 ± 0.74 | 14.81 ± 0.28 | 12.93 ± 1.55 |
| Water intake/ d(g) | 19.53 ± 0.85 | 18.14 ± 1.71 | 15.00 ± 1.00 | 15.76 ± 0.78 |
| Calorie Intake (kj/day) | 307.6 ± 7.3a | 305.1 ± 3.5a | 412.9 ± 7.5b | 385.3 ± 6.0b,c |
| Liver wet weight (g/ 100 g of body weight) | 3.51 ± 0.05 | 2.74 ± 0.23 | 3.63 ± 0.09 | 2.70 ± 0.06 |
| Heart wet weight | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± .00 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| Pancreas wet weight | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.03 |
| Fat deposition | ||||
| Paritoneal fat (g/ 100 g of body weight) | 1.12 ± 0.12a | 0.91 ± 0.08a | 2.37 ± 0.16b | 1.65 ± 0.15a |
| Epididymal fat (g/ 100 g of body weight) | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 1.05 ± 0.15 | 1.14 ± 0.09 | 1.06 ± 0.09 |
| Mesenteric (g/ 100 g of body weight) | 0.69 ± 0.19 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.07 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs HCHF or HCHF vs tretment which are different at p < 0.05
Fig. 3Effect of Cardamom powder supplementation on body weight, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before and after the high fat high carbohydrate diet feeding in rats. Values are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a OGTT before tretment. b OGTT after tretment. c OGTT AUC BF. d OGTT AUC AF
Effects of fat diets on biochemical parameters in plasma and liver
| Control | Control + Cardamom | HCHF | HCHFF+ Cardamom | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ||||
| AST(U/L) | 28.71 ± 3.63a | 22.97 ± 3.63a | 57.42 ± 6.58b | 30.15 ± 1.93a |
| ALT(U/L) | 34.45 ± 4.45a | 35.89 ± 2.65a | 57.42 ± 1.82b | 40.20 ± 3.63a |
| ALP(U/L) | 60.67 ± 3.36a | 50.38 ± 5.38a | 102.19 ± 5.69b | 47.49 ± 1.46a |
| MDA(nmol/mL) | 29.10 ± 2.06a | 27.61 ± 2.49a | 54.43 ± 2.12b | 20.48 ± 1.14a |
| NO(nmol/mL) | 8.44 ± 0.66a | 9.77 ± 1.28a | 17.36 ± 1.34b | 8.87 ± 0.47a |
| APOP | 268.81 ± 23.38a | 185.08 ± 14.99a | 570.40 ± 42.42b | 148.17 ± 11.25a |
| Catalase(U/min) | 19.67 ± 3.41a | 16.17 ± 1.68a | 8.83 ± 0.87b | 14.50 ± 1.80a |
| GSH (μg/mg protein) | 23.33 ± 1.74a | 29.01 ± 1.40a | 14.40 ± 0.38b | 26.02 ± 0.58a |
| SOD (U/L) | 43.47 ± 3.55a | 51.86 ± 8.19a | 15.34 ± 2.33b | 44.32 ± 7.73a |
| Cholesterol(mg/dL) | 155.18 ± 8.31a | 163.03 ± 4.04a | 290.25 ± 19.47b | 183.70 ± 5.24a |
| Triglycerides(mg/dL) | 196.75 ± 8.31a | 160.3 ± 5.1a | 316.89 ± 22.31b | 169.32 ± 13.44a |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 41.14 ± 0.97a | 66.66 ± 4.51b,c | 54.56 ± 2.79b | 66.44 ± 3.05b,c |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 74.69 ± 8.12a | 64.30 ± 4.64a | 172.31 ± 20.35b | 83.40 ± 3.97a |
| Liver | ||||
| MDA(nmol/g tissue) | 89.41 ± 4.73a | 101.85 ± 7.17a | 146.21 ± 8.82b | 117.49 ± 8.16a |
| NO(nmol/g tissue) | 25.68 ± 1.98a | 32.79 ± 5.51a | 84.87 ± 10.8b | 40.91 ± 3.63a |
| APOP | 583.65 ± 51.80a | 489.21 ± 20.88a | 1384.44 ± 84.44b | 420.95 ± 82.05a |
| Catalase(U/min) | 25.00 ± 4.28a | 20.00 ± 2.58a | 10.83 ± 1.54b | 22.50 ± 4.43a |
| GSH(μg/mg protien) | 29.48 ± 2.37a | 29.01 ± 1.40a | 11.09 ± 0.40b | 26.02 ± 0.58a |
| SOD (U/g tissue) | 42.95 ± 6.74a | 43.85 ± 4.21a | 17.71 ± 1.80b | 41.90 ± 6.44a |
| MPO (U/ g tissue) | 0.35 ± 0.06a | 0.44 ± 0.05a | 1.37 ± 0.08b | 0.93 ± 0.16a |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs HCHF or HCHF vs tretment which are different at p < 0.05
Fig. 4Effect of cardamom powder on hepatic inflammatory cells infiltration in HCHF diet rats. a Control, (b) Control + Cardamom; (c) HCHF (10× magnification); (d) HCHF, inflammatory cells infiltration, (e) HCHF (fat droplet deposition) and (f) HCHF + Cardamom. Magnifications 40X
Fig. 5Effect of cardamom powder on hepatic fibrosis in HCHF diet rats. a Control, (b) Control + Cardamom; (c) HCHF; (d) HCHF + Cardamom. Magnifications 40X
Fig. 6Effect of cardamom powder on hepatic iron deposition (blue deposits) in HCHF diet rats. a Control, (b) Control + Cardamom; (c) HCHF; (d) HCHF + Cardamom. Magnifications 40X