| Literature DB >> 28806485 |
Dan Jackson1, Sylwia Bujkiewicz2, Martin Law1, Richard D Riley3, Ian R White1,4.
Abstract
Random-effects meta-analyses are very commonly used in medical statistics. Recent methodological developments include multivariate (multiple outcomes) and network (multiple treatments) meta-analysis. Here, we provide a new model and corresponding estimation procedure for multivariate network meta-analysis, so that multiple outcomes and treatments can be included in a single analysis. Our new multivariate model is a direct extension of a univariate model for network meta-analysis that has recently been proposed. We allow two types of unknown variance parameters in our model, which represent between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency. Inconsistency arises when different forms of direct and indirect evidence are not in agreement, even having taken between-study heterogeneity into account. However, the consistency assumption is often assumed in practice and so we also explain how to fit a reduced model which makes this assumption. Our estimation method extends several other commonly used methods for meta-analysis, including the method proposed by DerSimonian and Laird (). We investigate the use of our proposed methods in the context of both a simulation study and a real example.Entities:
Keywords: Incoherence; Mixed treatment comparisons; Multiple treatments meta-analysis; Random-effects models
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806485 PMCID: PMC6038911 DOI: 10.1111/biom.12762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometrics ISSN: 0006-341X Impact factor: 2.571