Literature DB >> 28806485

A matrix-based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta-analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects.

Dan Jackson1, Sylwia Bujkiewicz2, Martin Law1, Richard D Riley3, Ian R White1,4.   

Abstract

Random-effects meta-analyses are very commonly used in medical statistics. Recent methodological developments include multivariate (multiple outcomes) and network (multiple treatments) meta-analysis. Here, we provide a new model and corresponding estimation procedure for multivariate network meta-analysis, so that multiple outcomes and treatments can be included in a single analysis. Our new multivariate model is a direct extension of a univariate model for network meta-analysis that has recently been proposed. We allow two types of unknown variance parameters in our model, which represent between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency. Inconsistency arises when different forms of direct and indirect evidence are not in agreement, even having taken between-study heterogeneity into account. However, the consistency assumption is often assumed in practice and so we also explain how to fit a reduced model which makes this assumption. Our estimation method extends several other commonly used methods for meta-analysis, including the method proposed by DerSimonian and Laird (). We investigate the use of our proposed methods in the context of both a simulation study and a real example.
© 2017, The Authors Biometrics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incoherence; Mixed treatment comparisons; Multiple treatments meta-analysis; Random-effects models

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28806485      PMCID: PMC6038911          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.

Authors:  J Hartung; G Knapp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; John R Thompson; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis.

Authors:  H P Piepho; E R Williams; L V Madden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Chen; Alisa K Manning; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Richard Riley; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Authors:  R D Riley; M J Price; D Jackson; M Wardle; F Gueyffier; J Wang; J A Staessen; I R White
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta-analyses with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Martin Law; Jessica K Barrett; Rebecca Turner; Julian P T Higgins; Georgia Salanti; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Characteristics of networks of interventions: a description of a database of 186 published networks.

Authors:  Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Anna Chaimani; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Haris S Vasiliadis; Christopher H Schmid; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bayesian meta-analytical methods to incorporate multiple surrogate endpoints in drug development process.

Authors:  Sylwia Bujkiewicz; John R Thompson; Richard D Riley; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multivariate network meta-analysis to mitigate the effects of outcome reporting bias.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Hwang; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Classifying information-sharing methods.

Authors:  Georgios F Nikolaidis; Beth Woods; Stephen Palmer; Marta O Soares
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Bivariate network meta-analysis for surrogate endpoint evaluation.

Authors:  Sylwia Bujkiewicz; Dan Jackson; John R Thompson; Rebecca M Turner; Nicolas Städler; Keith R Abrams; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Identifying inconsistency in network meta-analysis: Is the net heat plot a reliable method?

Authors:  Suzanne C Freeman; David Fisher; Ian R White; Anne Auperin; James R Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  Uptake of methodological advances for synthesis of continuous and time-to-event outcomes would maximize use of the evidence base.

Authors:  Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Dan Jackson; Georgia Salanti; Danielle L Burke; Malcolm Price; Jamie Kirkham; Ian R White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-13

9.  A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.

Authors:  Burak Kürsad Günhan; Tim Friede; Leonhard Held
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta-analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes.

Authors:  Malcolm J Price; Helen A Blake; Sara Kenyon; Ian R White; Dan Jackson; Jamie J Kirkham; James P Neilson; Jonathan J Deeks; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.