Literature DB >> 28806334

Cochlear Implantation in Postlingual Adult Patients With Long-Term Auditory Deprivation.

Maria Del Mar Medina1, Ruben Polo, Auxiliadora Gutierrez, Alfonso Muriel, Miguel Vaca, Cecilia Perez, Adela Cordero, Ignacio Cobeta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of long-term hearing deprivation in cochlear implant performance is not well established, and the limits for implanting an auditory deprived ear are still unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term auditory deprivation time on cochlear implant results. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review study.
SETTING: Cochlear implantation tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with postlingual deafness. INTERVENTION: Unilateral cochlear implantation between 2001 and January 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age at implantation, sex, etiology of hearing loss, and duration of auditory deprivation in the implanted ear were collected. Cochlear implants results were expressed in terms of vowel identification, disyllabic word recognition, and sentence recognition.Spearman's correlation test was applied to determine the relationship between auditory deprivation time and speech recognition scores. Additionally, patients were divided according to their auditory deprivation time before implantation in group A (less than 10 yr) and group B (more than 10 yr).
RESULTS: One hundred three patients met inclusion criteria for this study. There were 61 patients in group A, with a mean deprivation time of 2.52 years. There were 42 patients in group B, with a mean deprivation time of 19.67 years.There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding speech recognition scores.Deprivation time in the implanted ear was not statistically correlated with cochlear implantation performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term auditory deprivation in the ear to be implanted does not negatively influence cochlear implantation results and should not be considered criterion to reject cochlear implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28806334     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: a uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Niccolò Favaretto; Gino Marioni; Davide Brotto; Flavia Sorrentino; Flavia Gheller; Alessandro Castiglione; Silvia Montino; Luciano Giacomelli; Patrizia Trevisi; Alessandro Martini; Roberto Bovo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The impact of etiology and duration of deafness on speech perception outcomes in SSD patients.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Marius Grubenbecher; Kristen Rak; Rudolf Hagen; Heike Kühn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise E Zhao; James R Dornhoffer; Catherine Loftus; Shaun A Nguyen; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Cochlear implantation in post-lingual adults: A 25-year experience at King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Isra A Aljazeeri; Abdulrahman Alomar; Fatimah AlTassan; Jawaher Alkhayyal; Abdulrahman Alsanosi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  Early Deafened, Late Implanted Cochlear Implant Users Appreciate Music More Than and Identify Music as Well as Postlingual Users.

Authors:  Christina Fuller; Deniz Başkent; Rolien Free
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.

Authors:  Asuman Alnıaçık; Eda Çakmak; Okan Öz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Cochlear Implantation After Radiotherapy of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Luchen Tian; Niels West; Per Cayé-Thomasen
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Chloe Vaughan; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; Angela Pellittieri; Brittney L Carter; Curtis J Stegman; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Chronic Deafness Degrades Temporal Acuity in the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Pathway.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.