BACKGROUND: Problem drinking carries significant health burdens, including an increased risk of hypertension. The effect of chronic alcohol intake on blood pressure (BP) in women is understudied and poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the relationships between drinking habits and BP in hypertensive women. METHODS: We analyzed drinking habits in 113 women followed in the Brigham and Women's Hospital Hypertension Clinic for at least one year. RESULTS: Among these women with well-controlled hypertension, baseline diastolic BP was significantly lower in moderate drinkers compared with women who rarely or never drank. Changes in both systolic and diastolic BP over 12 months showed a significant negative association with changes in percent drinking days. In contrast, there was a trend toward higher baseline systolic BP among those women who consumed more drinks per drinking day. CONCLUSIONS: Among these women with controlled hypertension, our data failed to demonstrate an association between drinking beyond recommended limits and higher disease burden. These findings parallel the widely reported difference between drinking frequency, associated with a host of positive health outcomes, and drinking intensity, associated with negative outcomes. Novel to this report is an observed reduction in blood pressure over the one-year follow-up period accompanying an increased drinking frequency in treated hypertensive women. Cautions include the suggestion that a greater number of drinks per drinking day was associated with higher baseline pressure. These data imply that drinking within sensible limits has no negative impact on chronic hypertension. In fact, for women with well-controlled hypertension, such a habit may impart benefit.
BACKGROUND: Problem drinking carries significant health burdens, including an increased risk of hypertension. The effect of chronic alcohol intake on blood pressure (BP) in women is understudied and poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the relationships between drinking habits and BP in hypertensivewomen. METHODS: We analyzed drinking habits in 113 women followed in the Brigham and Women's Hospital Hypertension Clinic for at least one year. RESULTS: Among these women with well-controlled hypertension, baseline diastolic BP was significantly lower in moderate drinkers compared with women who rarely or never drank. Changes in both systolic and diastolic BP over 12 months showed a significant negative association with changes in percent drinking days. In contrast, there was a trend toward higher baseline systolic BP among those women who consumed more drinks per drinking day. CONCLUSIONS: Among these women with controlled hypertension, our data failed to demonstrate an association between drinking beyond recommended limits and higher disease burden. These findings parallel the widely reported difference between drinking frequency, associated with a host of positive health outcomes, and drinking intensity, associated with negative outcomes. Novel to this report is an observed reduction in blood pressure over the one-year follow-up period accompanying an increased drinking frequency in treated hypertensivewomen. Cautions include the suggestion that a greater number of drinks per drinking day was associated with higher baseline pressure. These data imply that drinking within sensible limits has no negative impact on chronic hypertension. In fact, for women with well-controlled hypertension, such a habit may impart benefit.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol; blood pressure; hypertension; women
Authors: Charles J Holahan; Kathleen K Schutte; Penny L Brennan; Carole K Holahan; Bernice S Moos; Rudolf H Moos Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Grace Chang; Naomi D L Fisher; Mark D Hornstein; Jennifer A Jones; Sarah H Hauke; Nina Niamkey; Christina Briegleb; Endel John Orav Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2011-04-12
Authors: A R Dyer; J Stamler; O Paul; D M Berkson; M H Lepper; H McKean; R B Shekelle; H A Lindberg; D Garside Journal: Circulation Date: 1977-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C S Fuchs; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; E L Giovannucci; J E Manson; I Kawachi; D J Hunter; S E Hankinson; C H Hennekens; B Rosner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-05-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John P Bantle; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Ann L Albright; Caroline M Apovian; Nathaniel G Clark; Marion J Franz; Byron J Hoogwerf; Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Arshag D Mooradian; Madelyn L Wheeler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Cristian Ramos-Vera; Antonio Serpa Barrientos; Yaquelin E Calizaya-Milla; Claudia Carvajal Guillen; Jacksaint Saintila Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Trevor S Ferguson; Novie O M Younger-Coleman; Marshall K Tulloch-Reid; Nadia R Bennett; Amanda E Rousseau; Jennifer M Knight-Madden; Maureen E Samms-Vaughan; Deanna E Ashley; Rainford J Wilks Journal: PeerJ Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 2.984