Literature DB >> 28805965

The interplay of climate and land use change affects the distribution of EU bumblebees.

Leon Marshall1,2, Jacobus C Biesmeijer2,3, Pierre Rasmont4, Nicolas J Vereecken5, Libor Dvorak6, Una Fitzpatrick7, Frédéric Francis8, Johann Neumayer9, Frode Ødegaard10, Juho P T Paukkunen11, Tadeusz Pawlikowski12, Menno Reemer13, Stuart P M Roberts14, Jakub Straka15, Sarah Vray1,4, Nicolas Dendoncker1.   

Abstract

Bumblebees in Europe have been in steady decline since the 1900s. This decline is expected to continue with climate change as the main driver. However, at the local scale, land use and land cover (LULC) change strongly affects the occurrence of bumblebees. At present, LULC change is rarely included in models of future distributions of species. This study's objective is to compare the roles of dynamic LULC change and climate change on the projected distribution patterns of 48 European bumblebee species for three change scenarios until 2100 at the scales of Europe, and Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg (BENELUX). We compared three types of models: (1) only climate covariates, (2) climate and static LULC covariates and (3) climate and dynamic LULC covariates. The climate and LULC change scenarios used in the models include, extreme growth applied strategy (GRAS), business as might be usual and sustainable European development goals. We analysed model performance, range gain/loss and the shift in range limits for all bumblebees. Overall, model performance improved with the introduction of LULC covariates. Dynamic models projected less range loss and gain than climate-only projections, and greater range loss and gain than static models. Overall, there is considerable variation in species responses and effects were most pronounced at the BENELUX scale. The majority of species were predicted to lose considerable range, particularly under the extreme growth scenario (GRAS; overall mean: 64% ± 34). Model simulations project a number of local extinctions and considerable range loss at the BENELUX scale (overall mean: 56% ± 39). Therefore, we recommend species-specific modelling to understand how LULC and climate interact in future modelling. The efficacy of dynamic LULC change should improve with higher thematic and spatial resolution. Nevertheless, current broad scale representations of change in major land use classes impact modelled future distribution patterns.
© 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity loss; dynamic; future; land use change scenarios; pollinators; projections; species distribution models (SDMs); wild bees

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28805965     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Climate change and landscape-use patterns influence recent past distribution of giant pandas.

Authors:  Junfeng Tang; Ronald R Swaisgood; Megan A Owen; Xuzhe Zhao; Wei Wei; Nicholas W Pilfold; Fuwen Wei; Xuyu Yang; Xiaodong Gu; Zhisong Yang; Qiang Dai; Mingsheng Hong; Hong Zhou; Jindong Zhang; Shibin Yuan; Han Han; Zejun Zhang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  From science to society: implementing effective strategies to improve wild pollinator health.

Authors:  Jane C Stout; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Forecasting the combined effects of future climate and land use change on the suitable habitat of Davidia involucrata Baill.

Authors:  Junfeng Tang; Xuzhe Zhao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Do pesticide and pathogen interactions drive wild bee declines?

Authors:  Lars Straub; Verena Strobl; Orlando Yañez; Matthias Albrecht; Mark J F Brown; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Habitat patches for newts in the face of climate change: local scale assessment combining niche modelling and graph theory.

Authors:  Clémentine Préau; Frédéric Grandjean; Yann Sellier; Miguel Gailledrat; Romain Bertrand; Francis Isselin-Nondedeu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessing species richness trends: Declines of bees and bumblebees in the Netherlands since 1945.

Authors:  Tom J M Van Dooren
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Island Bees: The Aegean Archipelago.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kougioumoutzis; Aggeliki Kaloveloni; Theodora Petanidou
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02

8.  Interactive effects of climate and land use on pollinator diversity differ among taxa and scales.

Authors:  Cristina Ganuza; Sarah Redlich; Johannes Uhler; Cynthia Tobisch; Sandra Rojas-Botero; Marcell K Peters; Jie Zhang; Caryl S Benjamin; Jana Englmeier; Jörg Ewald; Ute Fricke; Maria Haensel; Johannes Kollmann; Rebekka Riebl; Lars Uphus; Jörg Müller; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Climate change winners and losers among North American bumblebees.

Authors:  Hanna M Jackson; Sarah A Johnson; Lora A Morandin; Leif L Richardson; Laura Melissa Guzman; Leithen K M'Gonigle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.812

10.  Climate change-driven range losses among bumblebee species are poised to accelerate.

Authors:  Catherine Sirois-Delisle; Jeremy T Kerr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.