| Literature DB >> 28805548 |
Katarzyna Cantarero1,2, Piotr Szarota2, Eftychia Stamkou3, Marisol Navas4, Alejandra Del Carmen Dominguez Espinosa5.
Abstract
In this article we show that when analyzing attitude towards lying in a cross-cultural setting, both the beneficiary of the lie (self vs other) and the context (private life vs. professional domain) should be considered. In a study conducted in Estonia, Ireland, Mexico, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Sweden (N = 1345), in which participants evaluated stories presenting various types of lies, we found usefulness of relying on the dimensions. Results showed that in the joint sample the most acceptable were other-oriented lies concerning private life, then other-oriented lies in the professional domain, followed by egoistic lies in the professional domain; and the least acceptance was shown for egoistic lies regarding one's private life. We found a negative correlation between acceptance of a behavior and the evaluation of its deceitfulness.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-cultural; egoistic lies; lying acceptance; other-oriented lies; work and private life
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28805548 DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1327404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Soc Psychol ISSN: 0022-4545