| Literature DB >> 28805396 |
M Alimoradi Jazi1, V A E C Janssen2, W H Evers2, A Tadjine3, C Delerue3, L D A Siebbeles4, H S J van der Zant2, A J Houtepen4, D Vanmaekelbergh1.
Abstract
Self-assembled nanocrystal solids show promise as a versatile platform for novel optoelectronic materials. Superlattices composed of a single layer of lead-chalcogenide and cadmium-chalcogenide nanocrystals with epitaxial connections between the nanocrystals, present outstanding questions to the community regarding their predicted band structure and electronic transport properties. However, the as-prepared materials are intrinsic semiconductors; to occupy the bands in a controlled way, chemical doping or external gating is required. Here, we show that square superlattices of PbSe nanocrystals can be incorporated as a nanocrystal monolayer in a transistor setup with an electrolyte gate. The electron (and hole) density can be controlled by the gate potential, up to 8 electrons per nanocrystal site. The electron mobility at room temperature is 18 cm2/(V s). Our work forms a first step in the investigation of the band structure and electronic transport properties of two-dimensional nanocrystal superlattices with controlled geometry, chemical composition, and carrier density.Entities:
Keywords: 2D superstructure; electrolyte gating; optoelectrical characterization; oriented attachment; self-assembly
Year: 2017 PMID: 28805396 PMCID: PMC5599871 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 11.189
Figure 1(a) Absorption spectrum of a monolayer of a square PbSe superlattice annealed at 80 °C. The red curve shows the absorption of a suspension of nanocrystals as a reference. Inset: Transmission electron microscope image of a part of a PbSe square lattice (monolayer) prepared by self-assembly and oriented attachment at 80 °C; the scale bar indicates 50 nm. (b) Tight-binding band structure for a square superlattice. The S–S and P–P valence-to-conduction band optical transitions are indicated with arrows and these lead to the first two absorption features in panel c. (c) Calculated tight-binding absorption spectrum for a square PbSe superlattice. Inset: geometry used for the calculation. The nanocrystals are modeled as spheres with a diameter of 5.5 nm. The spheres are connected by cylinders of 2.2 nm in length.
Figure 2(a) Changes in the absorptance on sweeping the gate twice between VG = 0 and −1.6 V. (b) The absorptance quenching measured at more and more negative potentials; electron injection starts at VG = −1.22 V (dark blue curve) that can be seen as a reference. With more negative potentials, the quenching initially becomes more dominant at low-photon energy and extends to the high-energy range for the most negative potentials applied. Inset: relative differential absorption for the S–S and P–P transitions at energies of 0.7 and 0.9 eV, respectively. (c) Tight-binding calculation of the absorption quenching on the basis of the band structure presented in Figure b.
Figure 3(a) Differential capacitance of a PbSe superstructure measured in forward (from −0.2 to −1.2 V) and backward scan. (b) Charge density and charge per nanocrystal of the PbSe superstructure in the forward scan. (c) The conductivity obtained from the source-drain current and the geometry of the gap (on a logarithmic scale). (d) Electron mobility of the superstructure at the potentials where the Fermi level is above the band gap (logarithmic scale).
Figure 4(a) Two-probe conductivity on a log-scale. The insulating region is due to the band gap of the PbSe superlattices. (b) The conductivity measured as a function of the gate voltage under conditions of electron injection. The conductivity was measured by setting a constant current of 10 nA between the two outer contacts while measuring the resulting voltage between the two inner contacts. The gated PbSe superlattice has dimensions of 2 μm (distance between the probes) by 16 μm (width of the channel). (c) Current between the outer contacts versus the voltage measured on the inner contacts for different gate voltages, showing that the current–voltage relationship is linear at all electron densities. In this measurement, the gate voltage is applied on the liquid gate pad.