Literature DB >> 28805295

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging identifies significant apical prostate cancers.

Alexander P Kenigsberg1, Tsutomu Tamada2, Andrew B Rosenkrantz2, Elton Llukani1, Fang-Ming Deng3, Jonathan Melamed3, Ming Zhou3, Herbert Lepor1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify significant apical disease, thereby informing decisions regarding preservation of the membranous urethra.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2012 and June 2016, who underwent a 12-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic biopsy (SB), preoperative 3-Tesla MRI, and sectioning of the prostate specimen with tumour foci mapping, were extracted from a single surgeon's prospective longitudinal outcomes database. Apical SB and mpMRI lesion results were compared with regard to their ability to predict aggressive tumours in the prostatic apex (PA), defined as prostate cancer grade group >1.
RESULTS: Of the 100 men who met the eligibility criteria, 43 (43%) exhibited aggressive prostate cancer in the distal 5 mm of the apex. A Likert score >2 in the apical one-third of the prostate was found to be more reliable than any cancer found on apical SB at detecting aggressive cancer in the apex. On multivariate regression analysis, which included Likert score in the apex, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate size and presence of any cancer on apical biopsy, only Likert score (P = 0.005) and PSA level (P = 0.025) were significant and independent predictors of aggressive cancer in the distal apex.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that MRI was superior to SB at identifying aggressive prostate cancer within the distal PA and may be useful for planning the extent of apical preservation during RP.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #ProstateCancer; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28805295     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

Review 1.  MR Imaging in Real Time Guiding of Therapies in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yvonne Wimper; Jurgen J Fütterer; Joyce G R Bomers
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Detectability of prostate cancer in different parts of the gland with 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Akihiro Furuta; Akira Kido; Yuki Teramoto; Shusuke Akamatsu; Naoki Terada; Toshinari Yamasaki; Takahiro Inoue; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  [Imaging of locally advanced prostate cancer : Importance of ultrasound and especially MRI].

Authors:  O Solyanik; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; J Ricke; D Nörenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Kyle H Gennaro; Kristin K Porter; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Samuel J Galgano; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Se Young Choi; Byung Hoon Chi; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Bumjin Lim; Wonchul Lee; Dalsan You; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.