Terri R Fried1,2, Kristina M Niehoff1, Richard L Street3,4, Peter A Charpentier5, Nallakkandi Rajeevan1,6, Perry L Miller1,6,7, Mary K Goldstein8,9, John R O'Leary1,5, Brenda T Fenton7. 1. Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Medicine, Program on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. 4. Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Program on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 6. Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 7. Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. 8. Palo Alto Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center and Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto. 9. Department of Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of the Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Medications (TRIM), a web tool linking an electronic health record (EHR) to a clinical decision support system, on medication communication and prescribing. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Primary care clinics at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 65 and older prescribed seven or more medications randomized to receipt of TRIM or usual care (N = 128). INTERVENTION: TRIM extracts information on medications and chronic conditions from the EHR and contains data entry screens for information obtained from brief chart review and telephonic patient assessment. These data serve as input for automated algorithms identifying medication reconciliation discrepancies, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and potentially inappropriate regimens. Clinician feedback reports summarize discrepancies and provide recommendations for deprescribing. Patient feedback reports summarize discrepancies and self-reported medication problems. MEASUREMENTS: Primary: subscales of the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) related to shared decision-making; clinician and patient communication. Secondary: changes in medications. RESULTS: 29.7% of TRIM participants and 15.6% of control participants provided the highest PACIC ratings; this difference was not significant. Adjusting for covariates and clustering of patients within clinicians, TRIM was associated with significantly more-active patient communication and facilitative clinician communication and with more medication-related communication among patients and clinicians. TRIM was significantly associated with correction of medication discrepancies but had no effect on number of medications or reduction in PIMs. CONCLUSION: TRIM improved communication about medications and accuracy of documentation. Although there was no association with prescribing, the small sample size provided limited power to examine medication-related outcomes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of the Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Medications (TRIM), a web tool linking an electronic health record (EHR) to a clinical decision support system, on medication communication and prescribing. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Primary care clinics at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 65 and older prescribed seven or more medications randomized to receipt of TRIM or usual care (N = 128). INTERVENTION: TRIM extracts information on medications and chronic conditions from the EHR and contains data entry screens for information obtained from brief chart review and telephonic patient assessment. These data serve as input for automated algorithms identifying medication reconciliation discrepancies, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and potentially inappropriate regimens. Clinician feedback reports summarize discrepancies and provide recommendations for deprescribing. Patient feedback reports summarize discrepancies and self-reported medication problems. MEASUREMENTS: Primary: subscales of the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) related to shared decision-making; clinician and patient communication. Secondary: changes in medications. RESULTS: 29.7% of TRIM participants and 15.6% of control participants provided the highest PACIC ratings; this difference was not significant. Adjusting for covariates and clustering of patients within clinicians, TRIM was associated with significantly more-active patient communication and facilitative clinician communication and with more medication-related communication among patients and clinicians. TRIM was significantly associated with correction of medication discrepancies but had no effect on number of medications or reduction in PIMs. CONCLUSION: TRIM improved communication about medications and accuracy of documentation. Although there was no association with prescribing, the small sample size provided limited power to examine medication-related outcomes.
Authors: Michael A Steinman; C Seth Landefeld; Gary E Rosenthal; Daniel Berthenthal; Saunak Sen; Peter J Kaboli Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Terri R Fried; John O'Leary; Virginia Towle; Mary K Goldstein; Mark Trentalange; Deanna K Martin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kristina M Niehoff; Nallakkandi Rajeevan; Peter A Charpentier; Perry L Miller; Mary K Goldstein; Terri R Fried Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Joanne Reeve; Michelle Maden; Ruaraidh Hill; Amadea Turk; Kamal Mahtani; Geoff Wong; Dan Lasserson; Janet Krska; Dee Mangin; Richard Byng; Emma Wallace; Ed Ranson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 4.106
Authors: Jason L Vassy; Charles A Brunette; Nilla Majahalme; Sanjay Advani; Lauren MacMullen; Cynthia Hau; Andrew J Zimolzak; Stephen J Miller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ephrem Abebe; Noll L Campbell; Daniel O Clark; Wanzhu Tu; Jordan R Hill; Addison B Harrington; Gracen O'Neal; Kimberly S Trowbridge; Christian Vallejo; Ziyi Yang; Na Bo; Alexxus Knight; Khalid A Alamer; Allie Carter; Robin Valenzuela; Philip Adeoye; Malaz A Boustani; Richard J Holden Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2020-10-22