| Literature DB >> 28804794 |
Katie O'Leary1, Jordan Eschler1, Logan Kendall2, Lisa M Vizer2, James D Ralston3, Wanda Pratt1.
Abstract
We introduce a mixed-methods approach for determining how people weigh tradeoffs in values related to health and technologies for health self-management. Our approach combines interviews with Q-methodology, a method from psychology uniquely suited to quantifying opinions. We derive the framework for structured data collection and analysis for the Q-methodology from theories of self-management of chronic illness and technology adoption. To illustrate the power of this new approach, we used it in a field study of nine older adults with type 2 diabetes, and nine mothers of children with asthma. Our mixed-methods approach provides three key advantages for health design science in HCI: (1) it provides a structured health sciences theoretical framework to guide data collection and analysis; (2) it enhances the coding of unstructured data with statistical patterns of polarizing and consensus views; and (3) it empowers participants to actively weigh competing values that are most personally significant to them.Entities:
Keywords: Design methodology; H.5.2 [Information interfaces and presentation]: User interfaces—evaluation/methodology; Health Informatics; Health attitudes; Mixed-methods; Q-methodology; Technology adoption; theory and methods; user-centered design
Year: 2015 PMID: 28804794 PMCID: PMC5554065 DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst