Li Zhang1,2, Qian Zhu1, He Wang1, Shanling Liu1. 1. West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengdu, Sichuan, China. 2. The First People's Hospital of ChengduChengdu, Sichuan, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our goal was to derive more sensitive and accurate Z-scores based on combined DNA count- and size-based algorithms to advance molecular diagnostics for noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal trisomies. METHODS: We included 180 cases at high risk for fetal aneuploidy who underwent amniotic fluid cytogenetic analysis. We calculated their traditional count-based Z-scores, as well as their 100-, 130- and 150-, and 166-bp size-corrected Z-scores, and determined each Z-score's reliability based on its comparison to the cases' cytogenetic results. RESULTS: We detected for trisomies 13, 18, or 21 among the 180 cases in our study by amniotic testing and DNA sequence analysis. None trisomies 13 was detected, while 1 case of trisomies 18 and 3 cases of trisomies 21 were found. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of traditional count-based Z-scores were 75%, 98.86%, and 98.33%, respectively, while these rates increased to 80%, 99.43%, and 99.44% with a count-based 100- and 166-bp size correction. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of count-based Z-scores with 130- and 150-bp size corrections were 100%, and neither of these algorithms yielded false positive trisomies, unlike other evaluated size correction Z-scores. CONCLUSIONS: Count-based Z-scores with 130- and 150-bp size corrections more robustly predict fetal trisomies than count-based methods alone or those combined with other size-correction cutoffs, such as 166 bp. These testing parameters may enhance the utility of DNA sequence-based methods for noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal trisomies.
PURPOSE: Our goal was to derive more sensitive and accurate Z-scores based on combined DNA count- and size-based algorithms to advance molecular diagnostics for noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal trisomies. METHODS: We included 180 cases at high risk for fetal aneuploidy who underwent amniotic fluid cytogenetic analysis. We calculated their traditional count-based Z-scores, as well as their 100-, 130- and 150-, and 166-bp size-corrected Z-scores, and determined each Z-score's reliability based on its comparison to the cases' cytogenetic results. RESULTS: We detected for trisomies 13, 18, or 21 among the 180 cases in our study by amniotic testing and DNA sequence analysis. None trisomies 13 was detected, while 1 case of trisomies 18 and 3 cases of trisomies 21 were found. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of traditional count-based Z-scores were 75%, 98.86%, and 98.33%, respectively, while these rates increased to 80%, 99.43%, and 99.44% with a count-based 100- and 166-bp size correction. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of count-based Z-scores with 130- and 150-bp size corrections were 100%, and neither of these algorithms yielded false positive trisomies, unlike other evaluated size correction Z-scores. CONCLUSIONS: Count-based Z-scores with 130- and 150-bp size corrections more robustly predict fetal trisomies than count-based methods alone or those combined with other size-correction cutoffs, such as 166 bp. These testing parameters may enhance the utility of DNA sequence-based methods for noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal trisomies.
Authors: K C Allen Chan; Jun Zhang; Angela B Y Hui; Nathalie Wong; Tze K Lau; Tse N Leung; Kwok-Wai Lo; Dolly W S Huang; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Y M Dennis Lo; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Eric Z Chen; Peiyong Jiang; Fiona M F Lun; Yama W Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Stephanie C Y Yu; K C Allen Chan; Yama W L Zheng; Peiyong Jiang; Gary J W Liao; Hao Sun; Ranjit Akolekar; Tak Y Leung; Attie T J I Go; John M G van Vugt; Ryoko Minekawa; Cees B M Oudejans; Kypros H Nicolaides; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rossa W K Chiu; Ranjit Akolekar; Yama W L Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Hao Sun; K C Allen Chan; Fiona M F Lun; Attie T J I Go; Elizabeth T Lau; William W K To; Wing C Leung; Rebecca Y K Tang; Sidney K C Au-Yeung; Helena Lam; Yu Y Kung; Xiuqing Zhang; John M G van Vugt; Ryoko Minekawa; Mary H Y Tang; Jun Wang; Cees B M Oudejans; Tze K Lau; Kypros H Nicolaides; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-01-11
Authors: Rossa W K Chiu; K C Allen Chan; Yuan Gao; Virginia Y M Lau; Wenli Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Chris H F Foo; Bin Xie; Nancy B Y Tsui; Fiona M F Lun; Benny C Y Zee; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jacob A Canick; Glenn E Palomaki; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Kun Sun; Peiyong Jiang; Ada I C Wong; Yvonne K Y Cheng; Suk Hang Cheng; Haiqiang Zhang; K C Allen Chan; Tak Y Leung; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205