| Literature DB >> 28804527 |
Catherine Ryan1,2, Emma Alcock2, Finbarr Buttimer3, Michael Schmidt1, David Clarke3, Martyn Pemble1,2, Maria Bardosova1,4.
Abstract
We present a study of a range of cross-linked chitosan composites with potential antimicrobial applications. They were formed by cross-linkingEntities:
Keywords: 103 Composites; 30 Bio-inspired and biomedical materials; 301 Chemical syntheses / processing; 503 TEM, STEM, SEM; 505 Optical / Molecular spectroscopy; 600 Others: Surface and mechanical analysis, Antimicrobial tests; Chitosan; antimicrobial; composite; cross-linked; gold nanoparticle; interpenetrating polymer network; silver nanoparticle
Year: 2017 PMID: 28804527 PMCID: PMC5532969 DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2017.1344929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Figure 1.Chitosan composite hydrogels (L–R): plain chitosan, Chi-TEOS IPN, Chi-TEOS IPN-Ag and Chi-TEOS IPN-Au.
Figure 2.Transmittance spectra of Ag and Au dispersions.
Figure 3.Infrared spectra of chitosan samples before and after cross-linking with siloxane polymer network and metal NPs.
Figure 4.Raman spectra of chitosan samples before and after cross-linking with siloxane polymer network and metal NPs.
Figure 5.SEM images displaying the thickness and apparent surface roughness of the various chitosan samples: (a) plain chitosan, (b) Chi-TEOS IPN, (c) Chi-TEOS IPN-Ag and (d) Chi-TEOS IPN-Au.
Figure 6.TEM images of (a) Ag NPs embedded in the Chi-TEOS IPN, (b) single Ag NP with one crystal facet observed, (c) Au NPs embedded in the Chi-TEOS IPN and (d) single multifaceted Au NP.
Surface roughness measurements of the various samples, showing an increased average surface roughness with increasing cross-linker density.
| Sample | Average surface roughness (Å) | Dispersity (±%) |
|---|---|---|
| Chitosan | 4588 | 250 |
| Chi-TEOS IPN | 6347 | 200 |
| Chi-TEOS IPN-Ag | 9174 | 209 |
| Chi-TEOS IPN-Au | 9722 | 196 |
Figure 7.Tensile strength results with metal NPs embedded as a function of increasing concentration. Results are on a par with stresses reached by the Chi-TEOS IPN prior to the addition of NPs. No concentration dependence was observed.
Figure 8.Relative absorbance values of chitosan, cross-linked Chi-TEOS IPN and Chi-TEOS IPN with Ag/Au NPs. The absorbance corresponds to the degree of bacterial attachment during the CV assay with E. coli. There is a significant reduction in attachment upon cross-linking with TEOS, while the addition of Ag/Au NPs does not contribute to antimicrobial activity.
Figure 9.UV-vis spectra of Ag/Au NPs at a series of concentrations. 2.5% is the concentration of Ag/Au NPs present in each sample. This peak is not observed during the release tests meaning NPs are not being released.
Figure 11.UV-vis spectra of Chi-TEOS IPN-Ag/Au samples being tested for release in basic and acidic conditions. The dips at about 395 and 525 nm indicate that the Ag and Au NPs are being released from the membrane in acidic conditions, respectively.
Figure 10.UV-vis spectra of the PBS solutions in combination with 0.1 M NaCl. Results indicate that Ag/Au ions are not being released as there is no change to the transmission spectrum.