Literature DB >> 28803953

Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD.

Hannes Hagström1, Patrik Nasr2, Mattias Ekstedt2, Ulf Hammar3, Per Stål4, Rolf Hultcrantz4, Stergios Kechagias2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is very common in the general population, but identifying patients with increased risk of mortality and liver-specific morbidity remains a challenge. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is thought to enhance this risk; therefore, resolution of NASH is a major endpoint in current pharmacologic studies. Herein, we aim to investigate the long-term prognosis of a large cohort of NAFLD patients, and to study the specific effect of NASH and fibrosis stage on prognosis.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 646 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients. Each case was matched for age, sex and municipality to ten controls. Outcomes on mortality and severe liver disease, defined as cirrhosis, liver decompensation/failure or hepatocellular carcinoma, were evaluated using population-based registers. Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex and type 2 diabetes were used to examine the long-term risk according to fibrosis stage. Likelihood ratio tests were used to assess whether adding NASH to these models increased the predictive capacity. Laplace regression was used to estimate the time to severe liver disease according to stage of fibrosis.
RESULTS: During a follow-up of mean 20years (range 0-40) equivalent to 139,163 person-years, 12% of NAFLD patients and 2.2% of controls developed severe liver disease (p<0.001). Compared to controls, the risk of severe liver disease increased per stage of fibrosis (hazard ratio ranging from 1.9 in F0 to 104.9 in F4). Accounting for the presence of NASH did not change these estimates significantly (likelihood ratio test >0.05 for all stages of fibrosis). Similar results were seen for overall mortality. The lower end of the 95% confidence interval for the 10th percentile of time to development of severe liver disease was 22-26years in F0-1, 9.3years in F2, 2.3years in F3, and 0.9years to liver decompensation in F4.
CONCLUSIONS: In this, the largest ever study of biopsy-proven NAFLD, the presence of NASH did not increase the risk of liver-specific morbidity or overall mortality. Knowledge of time to development of severe liver disease according to fibrosis stage can be used in individual patient counselling and for public health decisions. LAY
SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is very common in the general population, but reaching an accurate prognosis remains challenging. We investigate the long-term prognosis of a large cohort of NAFLD patients. In this, the largest ever study of biopsy-proven NAFLD, the presence of NASH did not increase the risk of liver-specific morbidity or overall mortality. Knowledge of time to development of severe liver disease according to fibrosis stage can be used in individual patient counselling and for public health decisions.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cirrhosis; Epidemiology; Steatosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803953     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  210 in total

Review 1.  Fructose-mediated effects on gene expression and epigenetic mechanisms associated with NAFLD pathogenesis.

Authors:  Johanna K DiStefano
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Association of Aspirin with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver-Related Mortality.

Authors:  Tracey G Simon; Ann-Sofi Duberg; Soo Aleman; Raymond T Chung; Andrew T Chan; Jonas F Ludvigsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Alcohol use in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver: a tangled web of causality.

Authors:  Danielle Brandman; Norah A Terrault
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Current Understanding of Risk for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Progressive Fibrosis.

Authors:  Mazen Noureddin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-07

Review 5.  Therapeutic pipeline in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Raj Vuppalanchi; Mazen Noureddin; Naim Alkhouri; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Pegah Golabi; Logan Rhea; Linda Henry; Zobair M Younossi
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  Origins of Portal Hypertension in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Gyorgy Baffy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Defining comprehensive models of care for NAFLD.

Authors:  Manuel Romero-Gómez; Jörn M Schattenberg; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Quentin M Anstee; Hannes Hagström; Kenneth Cusi; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Henry E Mark; Michael Roden; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Zobair M Younossi; Shira Zelber-Sagi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance imaging analysis of liver fibrosis and inflammation: overwhelming gray zones restrict clinical use.

Authors:  D Marti-Aguado; A Rodríguez-Ortega; A Alberich-Bayarri; L Marti-Bonmati
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Wenhao Li; William Alazawi
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.