Literature DB >> 28803651

Using national hip fracture registries and audit databases to develop an international perspective.

Antony Johansen1, David Golding2, Louise Brent3, Jacqueline Close4, Jan-Erik Gjertsen5, Graeme Holt6, Ami Hommel7, Alma B Pedersen8, Niels Dieter Röck9, Karl-Göran Thorngren10.   

Abstract

Hip fracture is the commonest reason for older people to need emergency anaesthesia and surgery, and leads to prolonged dependence for many of those who survive. People with this injury are usually identified very early in their hospital care, so hip fracture is an ideal marker condition with which to audit the care offered to older people by health services around the world. We have reviewed the reports of eight national audit programmes, to examine the approach used in each, and highlight differences in case mix, management and outcomes in different countries. The national audits provide a consistent picture of typical patients - an average age of 80 years, with less than a third being men, and a third of all patients having cognitive impairment - but there was surprising variation in the type of fracture, of operation and of anaesthesia and hospital length of stay in different countries. These national audits provide a unique opportunity to compare how health care systems of different countries are responding to the same clinical challenge. This review will encourage the development and reporting of a standardised dataset to support international collaboration in healthcare audit.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audit; Hip fracture; International; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803651     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  26 in total

Review 1.  What do perioperative national clinical audits tell us? The evolving role of national audits in changing practice and improving outcomes.

Authors:  C M Oliver; S Hare
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-07-05

2.  The 30-day survival and recovery after hip fracture by timing of mobilization and dementia : a UK database study.

Authors:  Aicha Goubar; Finbarr C Martin; Chris Potter; Gareth D Jones; Catherine Sackley; Salma Ayis; Katie J Sheehan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries.

Authors:  C Ojeda-Thies; P Sáez-López; C T Currie; F J Tarazona-Santalbina; T Alarcón; A Muñoz-Pascual; T Pareja; P Gómez-Campelo; N Montero-Fernández; J Mora-Fernández; R Larrainzar-Garijo; E Gil-Garay; I Etxebarría-Foronda; J R Caeiro; A Díez-Pérez; D Prieto-Alhambra; L Navarro-Castellanos; A Otero-Puime; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The Global Burden of Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Seth M Tarrant; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Trends in hip fracture care in the Republic of Ireland from 2013 to 2018: results from the Irish Hip Fracture Database.

Authors:  M E Walsh; H Ferris; T Coughlan; C Hurson; E Ahern; J Sorensen; L Brent
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Mortality rates and risk factors after low-trauma hip fracture in the largest university center in Romania.

Authors:  Ramona Dobre; Dan Alexandru Niculescu; Catalin Cirstoiu; Gheorghe Popescu; Catalina Poiana
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review.

Authors:  S C Voeten; P Krijnen; D M Voeten; J H Hegeman; M W J M Wouters; I B Schipper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Estonian hip fracture data from 2009 to 2017: high rates of non-operative management and high 1-year mortality.

Authors:  Pärt Prommik; Helgi Kolk; Pirja Sarap; Egon Puuorg; Eva Harak; Andres Kukner; Mati Pääsuke; Aare Märtson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  The Increase of Osteoporotic Hip Fractures and Associated One-Year Mortality in Poland: 2008-2015.

Authors:  Wojciech Glinkowski; Jerzy Narloch; Krzysztof Krasuski; Andrzej Śliwczyński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Nonoperative hip fracture management practices and patient survival compared to surgical care: an analysis of Estonian population-wide data.

Authors:  Pärt Prommik; Kaspar Tootsi; Toomas Saluse; Aare Märtson; Helgi Kolk
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.