Literature DB >> 28803452

Colonoscopic surveillance: quality, guidelines and effectiveness.

Timothy J Chittleborough1,2,3,4, Joseph C Kong1,2,3,4, Glen R Guerra1,2,3,4, Robert Ramsay1,2,4, Alexander G Heriot1,2,3.   

Abstract

Colonoscopic surveillance in patients with a personal or family history of colorectal carcinoma or colonic polyps represents a significant workload for endoscopy services. Effective colonoscopic surveillance relies on quality endoscopic examination and appropriate surveillance interval. This review will discuss quality in colonoscopy and review guidelines for surveillance.
© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic polyp; colonoscopy; colorectal carcinoma; surveillance

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28803452     DOI： 10.1111/ans.14141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN： 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  2 in total

1.  Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rates.

Authors:  Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu; Gurfarmaan Singh; Khizar Rana; Masanao Nakamura; Takeshi Yamamura; Sudarshan Krishnamurthi; Amanda Ovenden; Suzanne Edwards; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Yoshiki Hirooka; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Alastair D Burt; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2020-02-11

2.  Downregulation of Wnt3 Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Development Through Inhibiting Cell Proliferation and Migration.

Authors:  Xiaobo Nie; Fulin Xia; Ying Liu; Yun Zhou; Wenling Ye; Panha Hean; Jiming Meng; Huiyang Liu; Lei Liu; Jianxun Wen; Xuequn Ren; Wei-Dong Chen; Yan-Dong Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.810
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.